Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Sunday February 05 2017, @02:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the solution:-pay-only-in-rutabegas dept.

Deterred by the security capabilities of chip cards for in-store payments, thieves have resorted to stealing credit-card numbers and passwords or opening new accounts with false credentials to use in making online payments for purchases, according to recent studies. Botnets also comprise some of the biggest increases in online card fraud.

"We predicted this [online fraud increase] would happen following [chip] cards in the banking industry years ago," said Mike Lynch, chief strategy officer at InAuth, a vendor of mobile and browser security products. (InAuth was recently purchased by American Express, but will remain a subsidiary.) Other countries, including Canada and Australia, also saw big jumps in online card fraud after chip cards were adopted, he said.

Lynch said the online fraud increase is probably higher for financial institutions than for merchants, but merchants are more open about the problem and discuss it more freely. "Banks don't typically want to disclose fraud," he said.

The amount of dollars put at risk by online fraud went up 55% from the second quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2016, according to the Pymnts.com study. That was a jump from $4.90 to $7.60 per $100 of online sales. For luxury goods alone, the dollars at risk were $12.10 per $100 in sales in late 2016.

Botnets were behind many of these attacks. The rate of attacks by botnets increased by 47% for the same period for all goods and by 87% for luxury goods alone, Pymnts.com said.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 05 2017, @02:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 05 2017, @02:57AM (#462995)

    What does it mean if $7.60 out of each $100 are at risk? That out $100 spent online, $7.60 is fraudulent? That seems hard to believe and you'd think someone would offer a card with two-factor authentication option that gives huge rewards for online purchases.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Sunday February 05 2017, @03:22AM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday February 05 2017, @03:22AM (#463001)

    I think it's related to the same accounting that calculates the "cost of hacked systems." Maybe $7.60 of every $100 transacted online is "at risk," but the actual losses are well contained in some (conveniently not discussed) small fraction of that $7.60.

    On the other hand, if we're talking retail, they'd gladly take another $100B business if they only had to lose 7.6B to fraud to get it, their margins are much higher than that.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]