Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday February 07 2017, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-borrowed-for-a-while dept.

On Monday, The Washington Post reported one of the most stunning breaches of security ever. A former NSA contractor, the paper said, stole more than 50 terabytes of highly sensitive data. According to one source, that includes more than 75 percent of the hacking tools belonging to the Tailored Access Operations. TAO is an elite hacking unit that develops and deploys some of the world's most sophisticated software exploits.

Attorneys representing Harold T. Martin III have previously portrayed the former NSA contractor as a patriot who took NSA materials home so that he could become better at his job. Meanwhile, investigators who have combed through his home in Glen Burnie, Maryland, remain concerned that he passed the weaponized hacking tools to enemies. The theft came to light during the investigation of a series of NSA-developed exploits that were mysteriously published online by a group calling itself Shadow Brokers.

[...] An unnamed US official told the paper that Martin allegedly hoarded more than 75 percent of the TAO's library of hacking tools. It's hard to envision a scenario under which a theft of that much classified material by a single individual would be possible.

Source:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/02/former-nsa-contractor-may-have-stolen-75-of-taos-elite-hacking-tools/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 08 2017, @03:52AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 08 2017, @03:52AM (#464425)

    And there you have it. If the data and software is so super sensitive, why are you using contractors?

    Because, when it comes to trustworthiness, there is functionally no difference.
    They all get the same background checks through the same agency.

    You are indulging in a correspondence bias. [wikipedia.org]
    There are a lot of contractors in government work, so it is unsurprising that the handful that have been caught doing something naughty were contractors.

    Let's say there are 1,000 contractors working for the NSA (a very conservative guess) and 2 or 3 (Snowden, this guy and one more for good measure) have walked out with secrets. That leaves 997 who have not, or 99.7% who have obeyed the rules as much as any NSA employee. Furthermore there have been employees like Robert Stephan Lipka [cnn.com] who have done worse.