Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday February 08 2017, @11:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the better-than-revenge-stinging dept.

A new study into honey bees has revealed the significant effect human impact has on a bee's metabolism, and ultimately its survival.

Researchers from The University of Western Australia in collaboration with Kings Park and Botanic Garden, Curtin University and CSIRO have completed a world-first study on insect metabolism in free flying insects, focusing on the honey bee. The study funded by an Australian Research Council linkage award has revealed the significant effect human impact on the environment had on bees, which are crucial for the planet, pollinating one-third of everything we eat.

Landscapes that have been degraded mean a reduction in the availability of resources which affects the metabolic rate of the honey bee and puts more strain on its body's ability to function.

Emeritus Professor Don Bradshaw from UWA's School of Biological Sciences said the researchers wanted to find out how honey bees' metabolism was impacted by human made changes to the environment such as clearing of land.

To do this they used a unique method to measure the energy expenditure of bees, originally developed by Professor Bradshaw and used in his research on honey possums. Through this method they were able to measure the metabolic rate of bees when they are in their natural environment, and compare pristine environments rich in resources to degraded environments.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Thursday February 09 2017, @07:34PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 09 2017, @07:34PM (#465197) Journal

    Yes, that's a quite plausible meaning, but even that needs to be made more explicit if you want the study to have any meaning. But this was a report in a "popular science" article on the web, it wasn't the actual report. So you're probably right about what they meant, it's just that it's quite plausible to argue for some other interpretation, also.

    FWIW, sometimes land that looks degraded to humans doesn't look at all degraded to some other animals. Often land that looks improved to humans looks extremely degraded to many other animals. For bees I would guess that it has to do with the availability of flowers, but it could also have to do with their seasonal growth patterns, or the presence of ordors that hid those of the flowers, or something else. The article doesn't really specify. My guess is that they don't want their audience to have to think about details, so they don't give them the details to think about.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2