Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday February 10 2017, @06:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-saw-it-coming dept.

Google has developed a neural network algorithm that can create reasonable approximations of a 32×32 image from a downsized 8×8 image:

Of course, as we all know, it's impossible to create more detail than there is in the source image—so how does Google Brain do it? With a clever combination of two neural networks. The first part, the conditioning network, tries to map the the 8×8 source image against other high resolution images. It downsizes other high-res images to 8×8 and tries to make a match.

The second part, the prior network, uses an implementation of PixelCNN to try and add realistic high-resolution details to the 8×8 source image. Basically, the prior network ingests a large number of high-res real images—of celebrities and bedrooms in this case. Then, when the source image is upscaled, it tries to add new pixels that match what it "knows" about that class of image. For example, if there's a brown pixel towards the top of the image, the prior network might identify that as an eyebrow: so, when the image is scaled up, it might fill in the gaps with an eyebrow-shaped collection of brown pixels. To create the final super-resolution image, the outputs from the two neural networks are mashed together. The end result usually contains the plausible addition of new details.

Pixel Recursive Super Resolution

There is an excellent write-up on Wikipedia about various techniques for creating face hallucinations — aka an enhanced-resolution image of a face.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday February 10 2017, @02:57PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 10 2017, @02:57PM (#465487) Journal

    Maybe not a rapper but a singer. And 'yo' is a unit of measure the yotta [wikipedia.org]-octave to denote the vocal range of the artist. You would probably need a suitable prefix such as nano atto yotta octaves, and even this probably gives incredibly small decimal numbers of measurement.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 10 2017, @04:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 10 2017, @04:23PM (#465516)

    Dude... what!? lmao

    • (Score: 1) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Friday February 10 2017, @04:35PM

      by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Friday February 10 2017, @04:35PM (#465521)

      maybe dannyB is a bot.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 11 2017, @02:00AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 11 2017, @02:00AM (#465660)

        Then who needs a man?