Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Saturday February 11 2017, @12:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-does-betteridge-say? dept.

Autotrader reports a study:

Canadians looking to impress on their next romantic date might want to stay clear of on-demand car services, taxis or even public transit, according to the findings of a recent autoTRADER.ca survey that explores the role of the automobile in modern-day dating. In fact, a whopping 92 percent of Canadians say they find it appealing when their date shows up with their own ride. And don't even think about "borrowing the car" for the occasion – close to half of the population surveyed (48 percent) reported that they would find a borrowed vehicle unattractive or "embarrassing beyond words."

While it is unsurprising a publication called Autotrader would find car ownership is necessary for romance, do the study's claims track? Do today's humans really prefer being picked up for a date by someone who owns a car? Is being picked up on a motorcycle really the least attractive?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 11 2017, @09:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 11 2017, @09:32PM (#465900)

    There is a subset who like fat chicks.

    If ugly is the criterion, however, I think that that needs a different verb.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday February 12 2017, @11:49AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 12 2017, @11:49AM (#466098) Journal

    Jimmy Soul said it better [youtube.com]

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 12 2017, @07:59PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 12 2017, @07:59PM (#466275)

      I'd think that a gal that is "plain" or has "unremarkable looks" might be a choice (with offsetting values like that she has a valuable skillset e.g. high earner, good cook, knows how to make money go a long way).

      ...but to pair off with a gal who is actually ugly requires a peculiar kind of guy.

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]