Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday February 12 2017, @05:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the sir-can-do-better dept.

It is often opined here on Soylent that Economics isn't real science. You would expect economists to disagree with that sentiment, but it turns out that there is a growing international movement within the world of economics itself, started by a group of students, that seeks to drastically overhaul the entire field. Some choice quotes from the article, which is in fact a review of a book "which formalises and expands the case" that economics is in need of reform:

In the autumn of 2011, as the world's financial system lurched from crash to crisis, the authors of this book began, as undergraduates, to study economics. While their lectures took place at the University of Manchester the eurozone was in flames. The students' first term would last longer than the Greek government. Banks across the west were still on life support. And David Cameron was imposing on Britons year on year of swingeing spending cuts.

Yet the bushfires those teenagers saw raging each night on the news got barely a mention in the seminars they sat through, they say: the biggest economic catastrophe of our times "wasn't mentioned in our lectures and what we were learning didn't seem to have any relevance to understanding it", they write in The Econocracy. "We were memorising and regurgitating abstract economic models for multiple-choice exams."

Part of this book describes what happened next: how the economic crisis turned into a crisis of economics. It deserves a good account, since the activities of these Manchester students rank among the most startling protest movements of the decade.

After a year of being force-fed irrelevancies, say the students, they formed the Post-Crash Economics Society, with a sympathetic lecturer giving them evening classes on the events and perspectives they weren't being taught. They lobbied teachers for new modules, and when that didn't work, they mobilised hundreds of undergraduates to express their disappointment in the influential National Student Survey. The economics department ended up with the lowest score of any at the university: the professors had been told by their pupils that they could do better.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 12 2017, @07:25PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 12 2017, @07:25PM (#466260)

    Some have. Here is one:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Keen [wikipedia.org]

    The ones that have not are in the pocket of those that profit from the status quo (and thus get the columns in the big name newspapers etc).

    BTW, check out Nakedcaptialism.com while at it. And no, thats not a porn site.

  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 12 2017, @07:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 12 2017, @07:45PM (#466266)

    When he says "The Economist", with that capitalization, a literate person would assume he means the news magazine The Economist, or if they'd never heard of it, something named The Economist. A further clue might be found in the context, where GP contrasts it to The Guardian, thus allowing the supposed literate person who has never heard of The Economist to infer that it's some form of news outlet, and one GP considers more trustworthy than The Guardian on this topic.

    Contrast that with your response, where you appear to read "The Economist" as "an economist". This was sufficient to distinguish you from a literate person; the carelessness with spelling and punctuation was redundant, but I do appreciate your effort to make sure we got the message.