Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday February 14 2017, @12:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the connect-the-dots dept.

Campaigners have expressed outrage at new proposals that could lead to journalists being jailed for up to 14 years for obtaining leaked official documents. The major overhaul of the Official Secrets Act – to be replaced by an updated Espionage Act – would give courts the power to increase jail terms against journalists receiving official material. The new law, should it get approval, would see documents containing "sensitive information" about the economy fall foul of national security laws for the first time.

In theory a journalist leaked Brexit documents deemed harmful to the UK economy could be jailed as a consequence.

[...] John Cooper QC, a leading criminal and human rights barrister who has served on two law commission working parties, added: "These reforms would potentially undermine some of the most important principles of an open democracy."

[...] "It is shocking that so few organisations were consulted on these proposed changes given the huge implications for public interest journalism in this country," said Ms Ginsberg.

The Law Commission sought advice from media groups including Guardian Media as well as civil liberties groups including Liberty and Open Rights Group. Other groups consulted included the intelligence agencies MI5 and MI6 as well as several government departments and senior politicians and lawyers.

[...] The Law Commission recommendations state that there should be "no restriction on who can commit the offence," including hackers, politicians and journalists.

[...] A Law Commission spokesman said it was "both misleading and incorrect" to suggest journalists were at any greater risk under the planned law changes.

Source: The Telegraph


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Tuesday February 14 2017, @04:13PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Tuesday February 14 2017, @04:13PM (#466979)

    I didn't very much want Trump to win, either, but he WAS the lesser of two evils, by orders of magnitude.

    That of course remains an open question, one that will be answered solely by alternate history buffs. I think what we can agree that what 2016 really highlighted more than anything else was the utter failure of the 2-party system to produce general election candidates that would actually be good for the country. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein also did not do well either for themselves or their parties with very public moments of idiocy. A Bernie Sanders versus Rand Paul general election would have been far better for the country, regardless of which one of them had won.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2