Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday February 15 2017, @11:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the 46-and-2 dept.

A 21-member committee of bioethicists, lawyers, patient advocates, biotech entrepreneurs, and others have recommended that heritable gene editing in human embryos be allowed at some point in the future, but only after more research, and only to prevent certain diseases or disabilities:

Scientists could be allowed to make modifications in human DNA that can be passed down through subsequent generations, the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine say. Such a groundbreaking step should only be considered after more research and then only be conducted under tight restrictions, the academies write in a highly anticipated report [open, DOI: 10.17226/24623] [DX] released Tuesday. Such work should be reserved to prevent serious diseases and disabilities, it says.

The academies determined that new gene-editing techniques had made it reasonable to pursue such controversial experiments down the road, though not quite yet. "It is not ready now, but it might be safe enough to try in the future," R. Alta Charo, a bioethicist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who co-chaired the committee, said. "And if certain conditions are met, it might be permissible to try it."

That conclusion counters a long-standing taboo on making changes in genes in human sperm, eggs or embryos because such alterations would be inherited by future generations. That taboo has been in place partly because of fears that mistakes could inadvertently create new diseases, which could then become a permanent part of the human gene pool.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Wednesday February 15 2017, @10:09PM

    by krishnoid (1156) on Wednesday February 15 2017, @10:09PM (#467620)

    "This baby has stopped breathing!"
    "Nah, it's just rich."

    This wouldn't work out well. I recommend instead placing a star on its belly [wikia.com]. I also recall that it stimulated the economy in the short-term, but eventually ended up further concentrating wealth.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2