Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Friday February 17 2017, @05:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the air-down-there dept.

A large research synthesis, published in one of the world's most influential scientific journals, has detected a decline in the amount of dissolved oxygen in oceans around the world — a long-predicted result of climate change that could have severe consequences for marine organisms if it continues.

The paper, published Wednesday in the journal Nature by oceanographer Sunke Schmidtko and two colleagues from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel, Germany, found a decline of more than 2 percent in ocean oxygen content worldwide between 1960 and 2010.

The loss of ocean oxygen "has been assumed from models, and there have been lots of regional analysis that have shown local decline, but it has never been shown on the global scale, and never for the deep ocean," said Schmidtko, who conducted the research with Lothar Stramma and Martin Visbeck, also of GEOMAR.

Because oxygen in the global ocean is not evenly distributed, the 2 percent overall decline means there is a much larger decline in some areas of the ocean than others.

Moreover, the ocean already contains so-called oxygen minimum zones, generally found in the middle depths. The great fear is that their expansion upward, into habitats where fish and other organism thrive, will reduce the available habitat for marine organisms.

In shallower waters, meanwhile, the development of ocean "hypoxic" areas, or so-called "dead zones," may also be influenced in part by declining oxygen content overall.

On top of all of that, declining ocean oxygen can also worsen global warming in a feedback loop. In or near low oxygen areas of the oceans, microorganisms tend to produce nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas. Thus the new study "implies that production rates and efflux to the atmosphere of nitrous oxide ... will probably have increased."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/02/15/its-official-the-oceans-are-losing-oxygen-posing-growing-threats-to-marine-life/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Friday February 17 2017, @07:22PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Friday February 17 2017, @07:22PM (#468308) Journal

    I'm guessing the OP was alluding to cold weather in North America in early 2014, which did set records:

    [...] the tiny unincorporated village of Daniel, Wyoming, plummeted to 48 degrees below zero. That wasn't the wind chill -- that was the actual temperature. It's the coldest temperature recorded anywhere in the contiguous United States in all of 2014.

    -- https://weather.com/forecast/national/news/cold-outbreak-ends-2014-west-midwest-northeast [weather.com]

    ...and was ascribed by some to global warming:

    This phenomenon has been suggested by some to result from the rapid melting of polar sea ice, which replaces white, reflective ice with dark, absorbent open water (i.e., the albedo of this region has decreased). As a result, the region has heated up faster than other parts of the globe. With the lack of a sufficient temperature difference between Arctic and southern regions to drive jet stream winds, the jet stream may have become weaker and more variable in its course, allowing cold air usually confined to the poles to reach further into the mid latitudes.

    -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_North_American_cold_wave#Role_of_climate_change [wikipedia.org]

    In contrast, this observation of decreased oxygen in the ocean is exactly what we would naively expect in a warming world. The decreasing solubility of oxygen in water as the water becomes warmes is well-known and well-documented. The authors also offer some other, more debatable reasons, "biological consumption" and "reduced ventilation."

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday February 17 2017, @07:51PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday February 17 2017, @07:51PM (#468320) Journal

    I'm guessing the OP was alluding to cold weather in North America in early 2014

    2014 was also the hottest year on record. Until 2015 then 2016 beat it.

    NASA, NOAA Find 2014 Warmest Year in Modern Record [nasa.gov]

    He must not know what the word "global" means.

    • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Friday February 17 2017, @08:56PM

      by butthurt (6141) on Friday February 17 2017, @08:56PM (#468338) Journal

      The OP acknowledged that "climate change is a fact" but noted that various observations have been ascribed to global warming, including, counter-intuitively, an episode of unusually cold weather. The OP seems to think that the way a variety of phenomena have been attributed to one cause amounts to intellectual dishonesty.

      For me the page you linked doesn't display properly. From what I can see of it, and from your comment, I'm guessing it says the global average temperature in 2014 reached a record high. If it doesn't explain the connection between that and the cold winter in North America, it may not address the OP's remarks.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Hawkwind on Friday February 17 2017, @10:55PM

        by Hawkwind (3531) on Friday February 17 2017, @10:55PM (#468390)
        The article mentions the topic briefly and doesn't provide any detail.

        Regional differences in temperature are more strongly affected by weather dynamics than the global mean. For example, in the U.S. in 2014, parts of the Midwest and East Coast were unusually cool, while Alaska and three western states – California, Arizona and Nevada – experienced their warmest year on record, according to NOAA.

        However the reason has received a good amount of attention this year. Here's one link http://www.sciencealert.com/satellite-data-shows-the-polar-vortex-is-shifting [sciencealert.com].