Climate Central reports
[...] A massive iceberg roughly 225 square miles in size--or in more familiar terms, 10 times the size of Manhattan--broke off [from the Pine Island Glacier] in July 2015. Scientists subsequently spotted cracks in the glacier on a November 2016 flyover. And in January, another iceberg cleaved off the glacier.
Satellite imagery captured the most recent calving event, which Ohio State glaciologist Ian Howat said " is the equivalent of an 'aftershock'" following the July 2015 event. The iceberg was roughly "only" the size of Manhattan, underscoring just how dramatic the other breakups have been.
[...] The ocean under Pine Island Glacier's ice shelf has warmed about 1°F since the 1990s. That's causing the ice shelf to melt and pushing the grounding line--the point where the ice begins to float--back toward land, creating further instability.
[...] The glaciers [such as the Pine Island Glacier] and ice shelves [such as the Larsen C ice shelf, which is on a death watch] help hold back a massive ice sheet on land. Their failure would send that ice to the ocean, pushing sea levels up to 13 feet higher than they are today.
[...] Cutting carbon pollution presents the only path forward to stave off the worst impacts of a melting Antarctic.
(Score: 2) by butthurt on Sunday February 19 2017, @06:30AM
I'm using a browser window that is probably somewhat smaller than most readers, and fonts that are probably much larger than other readers'. When I opened the edited link,
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/antarctica-iceberg-climate-21167 [climatecentral.org]
it showed me the Climate Central logo and the beginnings of columns labelled "Who We Are," "What We Do" and "About Our Expertise." By scrolling down, I could see the story, none of which was visible until I scrolled.
When I opened the submitter's link,
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/antarctica-iceberg-climate-21167#content [climatecentral.org]
the story's headline appeared conveniently--and less confusingly--at the top of my browser window.
The text after the "#" is not sent to the Web server.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier [wikipedia.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 19 2017, @07:55AM
I've seen that claimed before.
OTOH, as AC #468854 notes above, some sites are adding an identifier to the URL they return as what, at first glance, appears to be a #FragmentIdentifier.
The ones I've noticed have a dot right after the crunch, then a 8-character or so alphanumeric string.
...so I'm skeptical about the claim.
.
As you note, folks with a non-typical browser config can benefit from an added #FragmentIdentifier.
I know that we have 1 blind Soylentil who relies on a screenreader and I think I've spotted another with greatly-reduced vision.
Those guys (and any potential newbies with similar limitations) are specifically who I'm thinking of when I add #FragmentIdentifiers.
That others also benefit is gravy.
When I find a site/page which doesn't use accessibility features, I append #NoFragmentIdentifiers to their URL to note that I have checked the link and that it is alive (but that their web guy is clueless).
Some sites are so horribly constructed and so thoroughly piss me off that I also append ?ExtremelyPoorUseOfAccessibilityFeatures .
Apparently, encountering that completely freaks out cmn32480 causing him to start deleting anything that he doesn't understand.
...instead if asking questions of knowledgeable cohorts or doing some basic research.
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 19 2017, @06:47PM
OTOH, as AC #468854 notes above, some sites are adding an identifier to the URL they return as what, at first glance, appears to be a #FragmentIdentifier.
The ones I've noticed have a dot right after the crunch, then a 8-character or so alphanumeric string.
...so I'm skeptical about the claim.
They aren't sent to the server. UNLESS you have javascript enabled and the server includes a spy script to extract the identifier and send it back to the server (or a 3rd party tracking server) as part of its javascripty spying job. But that's independent of the initial http page load.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 19 2017, @09:04PM
Now, see there.
Some might have thought that this (sub)thread wandered away from the original topic and is a distraction, but it's getting some useful information posted.
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]