Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Sunday February 19 2017, @07:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the lazy-sunday dept.

The next time you're in a parking lot, or when you're walking on the sidewalk along a street with lots of parked cars, take a look at the windshield wipers. On some cars, the wiper arms are mounted fairly close to each other and are designed to move in unison. On others, the arms are mounted at opposite sides of the car and face each other in the center of the windshield. Some wiper arms are short and some are long. Some are straight, and some, especially on newer cars, are curved or bent.

Like so many things we take for granted, wiper design turns out to be a surprisingly nuanced rabbit hole once you take a moment to notice it, with no two cars seeming to have the same configuration. It's fun to imagine an army of industrious wiper elves coming up with just the right design to provide the proper visual accent for each vehicle.

But the reality is that wiper design is driven primarily by practicalities, not aesthetics. "The wiper system is usually designed pretty late in the process," said Doug Patton, executive vice president of engineering for Denso International America, which makes wiper systems and other automotive components for many car brands. "That's why you see these variations from car to car. The wiper system is usually designed to work within the rest of the vehicle design."

[...] "As you're designing and styling the car, there are people who'll check it for engineering feasibility, including those wipe percentages," said Gausden. "If they can't meet those federal requirements, they may have to change the windshield angle and curvature, or even the hood placement. So the wiper system isn't always the red-headed stepchild. It can drive and impact styling regarding hood height and windshield angle."

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Sunday February 19 2017, @09:55PM

    by wonkey_monkey (279) on Sunday February 19 2017, @09:55PM (#469087) Homepage

    On others, the arms are mounted at opposite sides of the car and face each other in the center of the windshield.

    Why would they do that? it doesn't seem to offer any advantage - in fact it means less clearing of the windshield in the center, for the driver.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by subs on Monday February 20 2017, @12:07AM

    by subs (4485) on Monday February 20 2017, @12:07AM (#469112)

    I thought this too until I owned a Citroen C4 with exactly this design. And TBH, I prefer it. The center gap is usually occupied by your rear view mirror, so you can't see through it anyway. However, one-sided designs routinely leave a huge unswept triangle on the passenger's side. It's not too bad for the driver, but the passenger basically has a line going almost straight through their vision. By comparison, the opposing system actually wipes the bit which people look through and ignores the bit they don't (behind the rear view mirror).
    http://s.hswstatic.com/gif/wiper-coverage.gif [hswstatic.com]