Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday February 21 2017, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-long-enough dept.

Two hackers who separately profited from stealing personal and financial data have been sentenced in the US. Sergey Vovnenko was jailed for 41 months for hijacking computers and selling stolen credit card numbers. Eric Taylor, who stole and then published sensitive information about celebrities and public figures, received three years' probation. Both were also involved in attacks on security researcher Brian Krebs, who exposed their online criminal activity.

Mr Krebs said Vovnenko was one of the administrators of a discussion forum that traded in stolen payment cards and personal data, in a blogpost reporting the sentencing. [...]As well as serving a 41-month sentence, Vovnenko will also be supervised for three years following his release and must pay compensation of $83,368 (£67,000).

Taylor was arrested in 2012 as part of a massive series of raids on criminal hacker groups around the world, co-ordinated by the FBI. Taylor was a member of a hacker group that published some of the stolen data exposing sensitive information about celebrities, prominent public figures and ordinary Americans.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Tuesday February 21 2017, @04:24PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday February 21 2017, @04:24PM (#469752) Journal

    Do we still use the term "Script kiddy"? Because that term leaps to mind when I think of a 16 year old "hacking" a couple celebrities.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday February 21 2017, @07:08PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday February 21 2017, @07:08PM (#469823)

    The proper term would have been "showed them the consequences of not using proper safeguards for sensitive information", had he kept publication to a proper minimum.
    Three years of probation is an unusually lenient sentence for such a high-profile case...

    • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Tuesday February 21 2017, @07:33PM

      by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday February 21 2017, @07:33PM (#469835) Journal

      Yes, I agree it's lenient, but, honestly, I think it's appropriate for a dumb kid. He gets a felony on his criminal record, and his probation terms probably prevent him from coming anywhere near the software industry where before being an idiot, he could've found a career.

      I'm generally opposed to the huge penalties that seem normal in the US, and even more so for minors, so you won't see me complaining about how light he got off.

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday February 21 2017, @07:54PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday February 21 2017, @07:54PM (#469851)

        Seconded. Realizing that dumb teens don't need decades in jail doesn't occur often enough to US prosecutors.

        Of course Rachid Al-Islamyah would have gotten 15 years.