Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday February 22 2017, @02:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the close-to-double dept.

Dissident Voice reports

After a week of limited coverage of "unimaginable levels" of radiation inside the remains of collapsed Unit 2 at Fukushima[...], Nuclear-News.net reported February 11 that radiation levels are actually significantly higher than "unimaginable".

Continuous, intense radiation at 530 sieverts an hour (4 sieverts is a lethal level), was widely reported in early February 2017--as if this were a new phenomenon. It's not. Three reactors at Fukushima melted down during the earthquake-tsunami disaster on March 3, 2011, and the meltdowns never stopped. Radiation levels have been out of control ever since. As Fairewinds Energy Education noted in an email February 10:

Although this robotic measurement just occurred, this high radiation reading was anticipated and has existed inside the damaged Unit 2 atomic reactor since the disaster began nearly 6 years ago.... As Fairewinds has said for 6 years, there are no easy solutions because groundwater is in direct contact with the nuclear corium (melted fuel) at Fukushima Daiichi.

What's new (and not very new, at that) is the official acknowledgment of the highest radiation levels yet measured there, by a factor of seven (the previously measured high was 73 sieverts an hour in 2012). The highest radiation level measured at Chernobyl was 300 sieverts an hour.

[...] This coverage relates only to Unit 2's melted reactor core. There is no reliable news of the condition of the melted reactor cores in two other units.

[...] Whatever is actually going on at Fukushima is not good, and has horrifying possibilities. It is little comfort to have the perpetrator of the catastrophe, TEPCO, in charge of fixing it, especially when the Japanese government is more an enabler of cover-up and denial than any kind of seeker of truth or protector of its people.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday February 22 2017, @06:21AM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Wednesday February 22 2017, @06:21AM (#470026)

    Can we get an adult to write articles? Whatever rag this same from fails. Maybe there is a problem here, but I can't get past the hyperbole.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 22 2017, @07:59AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 22 2017, @07:59AM (#470047)

    Whatever rag this same from fails.

    It is always the same fails, no matter what rag you use.

  • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Thursday February 23 2017, @05:00AM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Thursday February 23 2017, @05:00AM (#470604)

    I don't even have to visit a site named "nuclear-news.net" to guess what kind of absurd bias they are going to have.

    If we are going to post obvious opinion pieces here, lets at least mark them as such.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh