Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday February 23 2017, @04:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the can-i-still-root-for-them-if-they're-no-longer-underdogs? dept.

AMD Ryzen Improves IPC by 52%, not 40%

AMD Ryzen 7 desktop chips are now available for pre-order, and will be released generally on March 2nd. The cheapest "Ryzen 7" 8-core chip will be $329, but has 16 threads just like the $399 and $499 versions (there had been some concern that it might not have multi-threading). Ryzen 3 and 5 series quad-core and hex-core chips will be released later.

AMD held a "Tech Day" to share details about its new chips. Over the past year or two, AMD has said that their goal was to improve instructions per clock (IPC) by 40% with Zen/Ryzen. Now they are saying that they have achieved that... by improving IPC by 52%. It's an impressive number that would not have been possible had Ryzen's predecessor, the Bulldozer architecture, been competitive with Intel's CPUs (on single-threaded performance). However, keep in mind that comparisons between Ryzen and Bulldozer or certain Intel Core i7 CPUs are still based on information provided by AMD.

The 8-core design features 4.8 billion transistors and "200 meters of wiring".

YouTuber removes footage of Ryzen Overclock World Record

YouTube tech pundit Austin Evans uploaded a video earlier today containing footage of AMD's Ryzen launch event. Shortly afterwards, the video was made private, then replaced with a re-edited version of the piece with a couple of changes. A section in which Austin outed the Vega video card by name was edited and overdubbed with the description "a really cool graphics card".

Another section of the video showed an overclocking competition held at the event with a number of well-known LN2 overclocking experts seeing just how far they could push the new Ryzen chips. This whole section was removed, including footage of "a Ryzen chip" running at just over 5.1GHz, followed by the OCers celebrating as a run on Cinebench's R15 multi-threaded performance test set a new world record.

Comments on the video asking why the video was replaced and uploaded confirm that the Vega mention and OC section were removed. Austin Evans did not explain exactly why these changes were made, merely saying "YOU SAW NOTHING" in the comments section.

The 5.1GHz figure is from my memory. I think it might have been 5.16GHz more exactly, but I'm not completely sure about that and obviously can't verify it from the original video.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday February 23 2017, @08:00PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday February 23 2017, @08:00PM (#470867)

    The AM4 socket [wikipedia.org] only has 1331 pins, which doesn't bode well for quad-channel DDR4.
    That page says support for four modules, but I assume it's 2 per channel...

    Which sucks, because I really need max bandwidth, and I can't see how Ryzen can compensate having half what the "Extreme" Intel have (for my workloads).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 23 2017, @09:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 23 2017, @09:05PM (#470888)

    only has 1331 pins

    That won't do. It obviously needs 6 more pins. I suggest adding JTAG.

    • (Score: 1) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Thursday February 23 2017, @09:26PM

      by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Thursday February 23 2017, @09:26PM (#470899)

      I figured they were saving it for AM4+

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday February 23 2017, @10:14PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Thursday February 23 2017, @10:14PM (#470924)

      They only need to add one more, and then cut it in half.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 23 2017, @11:12PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 23 2017, @11:12PM (#470946)

        Optimizing for Windows 10?