Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday February 24 2017, @03:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-just-pottering-around dept.

About 3,000 years ago, a potter near Jerusalem made a big jar. It was meant to hold olive oil or wine or something else valuable enough to send to the king as a tax payment. The jar's handles were stamped with a royal seal, and the pot went into the kiln.

[...] All those years ago, as potters continued to throw clay, the molten iron that was rotating deep below them tugged at tiny bits of magnetic minerals embedded in the potters' clay. As the jars were heated in the kiln and then subsequently cooled, those minerals swiveled and froze into place like tiny compasses, responding to the direction and strength of the Earth's magnetic field at that very moment.

"It's kind of like a tape recorder," [Erez] Ben-Yosef says.

[...] When Ben-Yosef and his colleagues studied 67 jar handles spanning from the late 8th century B.C. to the late 2nd century B.C., they found that the Earth's magnetic activity has been a lot choppier than people expected.

Source: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/14/515032512/iron-age-potters-carefully-recorded-earths-magnetic-field-by-accident

Ben-Yosef et al. Six centuries of geomagnetic intensity variations recorded by royal Judean stamped jar handles [PNAS (2017) - Early Edition] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615797114


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 24 2017, @08:04AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 24 2017, @08:04AM (#471031)

    you could at least read the famous summary, where the title of the famous article is contained.
    it says "intensity", not orientation.

  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Friday February 24 2017, @08:16AM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Friday February 24 2017, @08:16AM (#471033) Journal

    Thank you, AC! But the Finish Summary does still contain some ambiguity:

    As the jars were heated in the kiln and then subsequently cooled, those minerals swiveled and froze into place like tiny compasses, responding to the direction and strength

    So they were only interested in strength, since the tiny compasses lost orientation? OK, Now I might have to actually go read the linked article, or at least throw some very large pots, for science.

    • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Friday February 24 2017, @05:16PM

      by wonkey_monkey (279) on Friday February 24 2017, @05:16PM (#471187) Homepage

      The orientation might be able to tell you the angle of the field from vertical.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk
      • (Score: 1, Redundant) by aristarchus on Friday February 24 2017, @10:57PM

        by aristarchus (2645) on Friday February 24 2017, @10:57PM (#471356) Journal

        Assuming the jugs were fired vertically? Just how large of a sample size are we working with?

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by wonkey_monkey on Saturday February 25 2017, @01:06AM

          by wonkey_monkey (279) on Saturday February 25 2017, @01:06AM (#471388) Homepage

          Assuming the jugs were fired vertically?

          Seems reasonable to me. They have flat bases, so how else would you place them in a kiln?

          --
          systemd is Roko's Basilisk
          • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday February 27 2017, @07:02AM

            by aristarchus (2645) on Monday February 27 2017, @07:02AM (#472130) Journal

            But a lot of jugs, including Amphorae, were pointed on the end. So is this a safe assumption? Or are we just doing "Holey Land" archeology?