Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday February 25 2017, @03:24AM   Printer-friendly

The VASIMR plasma rocket faces its biggest test yet: operating at a 100 kW power level for a continuous 100 hours:

As part of a program to develop the next generation of in-space propulsion systems, NASA awarded Franklin Chang-Díaz's company, Ad Astra, a three-year, $9 million contract in 2015. This unlocked an opportunity long awaited—a chance to prove the doubters wrong. Naturally, it won't be easy. Ad Astra must fire its plasma rocket for 100 hours, at a power level of 100 kilowatts, next year. [...] During a visit this month, the VASIMR engine fired at 100kW for 10 seconds and 50kW for one minute.

[...] Proven, powerful electric propulsion would lower the cost of human landings on Mars. NASA already has plenty of experience with chemical rocket engines and in-space propulsion, but such missions would require multiple launches of the Space Launch System rocket to provide all of the fuel needed for a Mars journey. A gas-sipping, electric engine for in-space propulsion would require far less fuel—and fewer launches from Earth to pre-position rocket fuel. To determine whether any of the electric approaches is feasible, the agency has set a rigid requirement of firing a 100kW engine for 100 continuous hours by mid-2018. "At that point in time you either do it or you don't," Crusan said. "This gets rid of a lot of ambiguity, because you can't really game a 100-hour test."

[...] For now, the skepticism toward Ad Astra is understandable. Virtually every news headline about the company's efforts to develop a plasma engine have focused on a single, fantastical number—39 days to Mars. While such a low transit time between Earth and Mars is theoretically possible with a much larger and more powerful VASIMR engine, there is one big catch: it would require a nuclear reactor in space to provide enough power to reach Mars that quickly.

NASA has had some abortive attempts, such as the Prometheus project, to develop nuclear energy for in-space propulsion. But due to the politics and sensitivity surrounding nuclear energy, the agency has never gotten very far down the path toward deploying some kind of in-space propulsion system driven by nuclear power. Based upon current technology, Chang-Díaz figures that large but manageable solar arrays could eventually provide up to 1 megawatt of energy for electric propulsion. But that is the value at Earth's distance from the Sun, and solar energy really falls off beyond Mars. So solar power seems to be good for transport in the inner Solar System. For areas beyond Mars, solar really won't work.

Advances in Duration Testing of the VASIMR VX-200SS System (PPT PDF).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 25 2017, @03:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 25 2017, @03:04PM (#471502)

    maybe i am a bit st0pid:

    39 days to Mars? it doesn't matter if you're sending a ant or a tank or the whole titanic? it's always 39 days and we just need more *OOHMP* the heavier/massive teh object is that wants to go to mars?

    it seems hazardous to launch a nuke into orbit which will then have enough *OOHMP* to ship the titanic to mars in 39 days:"oops, the control software has a glitch and the nuke is heading for some perfectly square state with a white house in the middle".

    also 1 MegaWATT solar is YYUGE!!!

    however ... a pizza delivery service with maybe 3 kW that launches from earth orbit every hour on the hour for ... forever. would require:
    24 * 39 *2 or 1'872 3kw-spacecrafts.

    fresh pizza to mars. delivery costs provided by the sun for free! sounds good!

    assuming we could send 0.5 kg (pizza) every hour to mars ... that's only 4'380 kg of pizza per year : (

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday February 25 2017, @06:36PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday February 25 2017, @06:36PM (#471563) Journal

    I think they assume the use of something like SLS/Orion. 39 days would be in comparison to estimated travel times like 6 months.

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17918-rocket-company-tests-worlds-most-powerful-ion-engine/ [newscientist.com]

    A 10- to 20-megawatt class VASIMR engine could propel human missions to Mars in as little as 39 days, he says, compared to the six months or more required with conventional rockets.

    Although there are submarines that have reactors that produce more than 20 MW, they have a distinct advantage: water cooling.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Saturday February 25 2017, @10:27PM

      by jmorris (4844) on Saturday February 25 2017, @10:27PM (#471643)

      Nope. What do you call megawatts dumped into the surrounding water? A heat plume. Once the other side has infrared sats you can't get away with dumping excess heat into the surrounding water.