According to the CBC [Canadian Broadcasting Corporation], researchers at Trent University sampled both the oven roasted chicken filets and the chicken strips that Subway uses on its sandwiches in Canada. After testing six small samples of the filets and three small samples of the strips, the researchers ran a DNA test.
The results showed that the filets contained just 53.6 percent chicken DNA. The strips were found to contain just 42.8 percent chicken DNA.
CBC reports that the rest of the DNA found in the chicken was soy — used either for either seasoning or filler.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 28 2017, @05:15PM
Well, that post has three sentences. However two of them don't contain the word "vegan" so they of course trivially have the same meaning with that replacement. So let's look at the only sentence that, indeed, contains the word "vegan":
This sentence does three things:
So what happens if you replace "vegan" with "moron"?
Well, the changed sentence would:
Conclusion: You are obviously the moron. Given your opinion about vegans, I also conclude that you are not a vegan. Therefore you are indeed a quite good example for the fact that not every moron is a vegan, and therefore that the first part of the meaning of that sentence is indeed changed by the replacement of "vegan" by "moron". Thus your very existence already proves your claim wrong.