Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday March 01 2017, @06:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the DOA dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Patent-holding company TQP Development made millions claiming that it owned a breakthrough in Web encryption, even though most encryption experts had never heard of the company until it started a massive campaign of lawsuits. Yesterday, the company's litigation campaign was brought to an end when a panel of appeals judges refused (PDF) to give TQP a second chance to collect on a jury verdict against Newegg.

The TQP patent was invented by Michael Jones, whose company Telequip briefly sold a kind of encrypted modem. The company sold about 30 models before the modem business went bust. Famed patent enforcer Erich Spangenberg bought the TQP patent in 2008 and began filing lawsuits, saying that the Jones patent actually entitled him to royalties on a basic form of SSL Internet encryption. Spangenberg and Jones ultimately made more than $45 million from the patent.

TQP appealed its case, and oral arguments were heard at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on February 8. Yesterday, the three-judge panel found in Newegg's favor, issuing a short two-page order that did not explain its reasoning. While TQP could theoretically still appeal to the full Federal Circuit or to the Supreme Court, it's far from clear there's any legal issue in the case that would compel either of those bodies to take the case.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Sourcery42 on Wednesday March 01 2017, @05:40PM

    by Sourcery42 (6400) on Wednesday March 01 2017, @05:40PM (#473412)

    I have my name on a patent too. In my eyes it was ridiculous. It is for a "novel combination of existing technologies." My experience mirrors yours in that the company owns it and it was essentially a cover your ass exercise. The worst part about it was working with the patent attorneys. Those guys are complete slimeballs. The worst lawyers I have ever crossed paths with. Their incentives and ways of doing things just comes across as perverse to those who tend to work more with technology than weasel words. It was quite possibly the most distasteful thing I've had to do in my professional career.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3