Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday March 01 2017, @08:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the a-study-that-has-some-bite dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Research out of the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health suggests preventive dental care provided by a dentist for children before the age of 2 enrolled in Medicaid in Alabama may lead to more care long-term. Early preventive dental care was associated with more frequent subsequent treatment for tooth decay, more visits and more spending on dental care, compared with no early preventive dental care for children, according to a study.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Dental Association and American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recommend children see a dentist once baby teeth begin to come in; but limited evidence is available about the effectiveness of early preventive dental care or whether primary care providers can deliver it. Despite the focus on preventive dental care, dental caries, such as tooth decay or cavities, are on the rise in children under the age of 5.

The study, published in JAMA Pediatrics, compared tooth decay-related treatment, visits and dental expenditures for children receiving preventive dental care from a dentist or primary care provider, and those receiving no preventive dental care.

[...] "Adding to a limited body of literature on early preventive dental care, we observed little evidence of the benefits of this care, regardless of the provider. In fact, preventive dental care from dentists appears to increase caries-related treatment, which is surprising. Additional research among other populations and beyond administrative data may be necessary to elucidate the true effects of early preventive dental care," the study concluded.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @08:40PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @08:40PM (#473506)

    Might a reason for this be that the immune system in a child under the age of 2 is still very much developing and coming to terms with the microorganisms the child encounters on a regular basis, establishing various levels of symbiosis with bacteria etc. in the digestive system including the mouth and saliva? That excessively treating these areas with antimicrobial solutions and traumatizing the nerves might disrupt the development of a healthy natural pattern of gene expression that leads to better long-term outcomes?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=2, Total=4
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4