Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday March 01 2017, @08:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the a-study-that-has-some-bite dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Research out of the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health suggests preventive dental care provided by a dentist for children before the age of 2 enrolled in Medicaid in Alabama may lead to more care long-term. Early preventive dental care was associated with more frequent subsequent treatment for tooth decay, more visits and more spending on dental care, compared with no early preventive dental care for children, according to a study.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Dental Association and American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recommend children see a dentist once baby teeth begin to come in; but limited evidence is available about the effectiveness of early preventive dental care or whether primary care providers can deliver it. Despite the focus on preventive dental care, dental caries, such as tooth decay or cavities, are on the rise in children under the age of 5.

The study, published in JAMA Pediatrics, compared tooth decay-related treatment, visits and dental expenditures for children receiving preventive dental care from a dentist or primary care provider, and those receiving no preventive dental care.

[...] "Adding to a limited body of literature on early preventive dental care, we observed little evidence of the benefits of this care, regardless of the provider. In fact, preventive dental care from dentists appears to increase caries-related treatment, which is surprising. Additional research among other populations and beyond administrative data may be necessary to elucidate the true effects of early preventive dental care," the study concluded.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by khallow on Wednesday March 01 2017, @09:43PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 01 2017, @09:43PM (#473543) Journal

    Does it make the quality of life and better long term health ?

    The study did claim:

    Adding to a limited body of literature on early preventive dental care, we observed little evidence of the benefits of this care, regardless of the provider. In fact, preventive dental care from dentists appears to increase caries-related treatment, which is surprising.

    If that is accurate, then the answer appears to be "no".

    It strikes me that we're seeing the same conflicts of interest as with a management consultant. If the consultant isn't, after a costly, in-depth examination of your business, telling you that you desperately need to buy their services, then call 911 and begin CPR.

    Similarly, dentists during routine inspections find problems that only dentists can fix. And the harder they look, the more such problems they can find.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by c0lo on Wednesday March 01 2017, @11:24PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 01 2017, @11:24PM (#473605) Journal

    A case of ounces of prevention adding up to metric shittones of dubious costs.
    I've seen this creeping into reality more times I care to remember; indeed, usually a symptom of conflict of interest.
    Not only involving consultants, but also anywhere a bureaucracy is creating the niche to thrive - and boy, aren't corporations rife with middle management?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford