Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.

Outstanding Issues

posted by on Monday March 06 2017, @10:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the post-bills-here dept.

Okay, we've all had our weekends and I at least am ready to jump back onto the coding horse. Refresh my memory of what we still have that's either properly broken or is otherwise behaving in an entirely unsatisfactory manner. I think Flat-mode links to individual comments are still broken. I know we need to replace the "noupdate" behavior with explicit "update" behavior. I'm thinking I can get the colors on "*NEW*" comments' subject bars brightened up so that you can ditch dimming and still have easy visual feedback if you like fairly quickly. I'm considering (nearly (can't do "N replies below Threshold)) precisely replicating Nested and adapting the old javascript to it if you care to run it. But what am I forgetting?

Discussion to a minimum here, please, so it doesn't distract from having an all-in-one-place list of things from this release that still need addressed.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Outstanding Issues | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 39 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Tuesday March 07 2017, @09:15AM (4 children)

    by NotSanguine (285) <{NotSanguine} {at} {SoylentNews.Org}> on Tuesday March 07 2017, @09:15AM (#475954) Homepage Journal

    The issue where clicking on a link to a comment in flat mode returns a "server configuration error" is now fixed (Thanks TMB, you rock!)

    However, when clicking on a link to a comment which has replies, the replies are not shown after the comment.

    Shouldn't showing a comment and any replies be the default behavior in Flat mode? It seems to be so in Threaded-TNG.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday March 07 2017, @10:50AM (3 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday March 07 2017, @10:50AM (#475965) Homepage Journal

    Yep, that's half-fixed not fixed-fixed.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.

    • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Tuesday March 07 2017, @01:41PM (2 children)

      by NotSanguine (285) <{NotSanguine} {at} {SoylentNews.Org}> on Tuesday March 07 2017, @01:41PM (#475994) Homepage Journal

      I can work around it so it's not a big deal.

      Just thought I'd mention it, given that's what this posting was for.

      Carry on sir.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr

      • (Score: 2) by paulej72 on Tuesday March 07 2017, @02:38PM (1 child)

        by paulej72 (58) on Tuesday March 07 2017, @02:38PM (#476025) Journal

        I decided that it was better to get the error fixed and at least show something rather than waiting for the final fix to be coded and tested. Hopefully the rest we had will allow us to figure out what is wrong with our fixed coded that will not pull up the children of a post in flat mode.

        --
        Team Leader for SN Development

        • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Tuesday March 07 2017, @03:26PM

          by NotSanguine (285) <{NotSanguine} {at} {SoylentNews.Org}> on Tuesday March 07 2017, @03:26PM (#476039) Homepage Journal

          I decided that it was better to get the error fixed and at least show something rather than waiting for the final fix to be coded and tested. Hopefully the rest we had will allow us to figure out what is wrong with our fixed coded that will not pull up the children of a post in flat mode.

          That makes a lot of sense (no insult intended :) ).

          Thanks for the clarification and all your hard work!

          --
          No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr