Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday March 08 2017, @07:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the From-the-"No,-YOU'RE-a-pedo"-department dept.

A BBC investigation found 100 "sexualised images of children" on Facebook. Auntie Beeb reported the images to Facebook, who found over 80% of them to be "not in breach of their guidelines" - despite one of them including a still from a child abuse video with a label requesting viewers "share child pornography."

The twist is that when the BBC followed up on this failure, Facebook reported the BBC to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre for "distributing images of child exploitation".

How can Facebook expect users to help them police their content when reporting abuse gets the users accused of the abuses they are reporting?

Alternate articles:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Wednesday March 08 2017, @09:07PM

    by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Wednesday March 08 2017, @09:07PM (#476713)

    Child pornography is great,” the speaker at the podium declared enthusiastically. ”It is great because politicians understand child pornography. By playing that card, we can get them to act, and start blocking sites. And once they have done that, we can get them to start blocking file sharing sites”.

    - IFPI’s child porn strategy [wordpress.com]

    It is very dangerous to have information deemed illegal by it's mere existence.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5