Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday March 09 2017, @04:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the Oscar-goes-to-someone-who-doesn't-exist dept.

http://www.cartoonbrew.com/vfx/cg-actors-logan-never-knew-149013.html

A long article going into great detail about how they staged, shot & digitally manipulated scenes in the movie Logan replacing the faces on stuntmen with the respective actor. When I watched the movie, I knew that X-24 had been de-aged and touched up a bit, but I never noticed any of the other scenes, in particular the Limo scene they describe in the article that was heavily modified.

While Hollywood has been relying on digital doubles for many years, the work in Logan is particularly seamless, even if the scenes are relatively brief and do not involve an avatar delivering any dialogue. It's perhaps another example of where things are headed with digital actors and how they can be used to help tell the stories directors are wanting to tell. Cartoon Brew sat down with the studio behind the digital Hugh Jackmans and Laura, Image Engine in Vancouver, who worked under overall vfx supervisor Chas Jarrett, to discuss how the the cg 'digi-doubles' were brought to life.

After being given the task of re-creating cg heads for Keen and Jackman, Image Engine's team immediately knew what it was up for. "Everyone knows Logan, for instance, and that's the biggest challenge," Image Engine visual effects supervisor Martyn Culpitt told Cartoon Brew. "We're literally looking at a real Hugh and a digital Hugh side by side in some shots."

The studio had completed plenty of digital human-type work before, but mostly as either human-esque creatures or as cg stunt doubles – never full-frame actors intended to be indistinguishable from the real actor. That meant Image Engine had to ramp up on their digital human pipeline, while also capitalizing on work they'd previously done in the area. "We basically had to build the whole system from scratch," said Culpitt.

Of particular note, their lighting software is open source.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by AndyTheAbsurd on Thursday March 09 2017, @04:28PM

    by AndyTheAbsurd (3958) on Thursday March 09 2017, @04:28PM (#477002) Journal

    Suppose Hollywood pays an actor and takes heaps of face scans.
    What stops them using the image of the actor in subsequent movies using cheap doubles in the subsequent installs of a franchise?
    For how long such an image can be used by Hollywood? 20 years, 100 years, forever? Are the face scans subject to copyright laws?

    The same thing that stops Hollywood from doing anything else they don't do today: Lawyers, preferably damn good ones that aren't working for the studios. So those scans can be used as long as the contract that the actor signed with the studio says it can, whether that's "20 years" or "only for installments 15 through 20 of The Fast and The Furious franchise". After that, the studio would have to request an extension, or risk getting sued by whoever they scanned (or that person's estate).

    --
    Please note my username before responding. You may have been trolled.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2