Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Friday March 10 2017, @01:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the they're-not-threatened-while-in-the-cage dept.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is considering repealing a rule that exempts captive members of 11 threatened primate species from protection under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). If the agency approves a repeal, the captive animals would be designated as threatened, like their wild counterparts, and researchers would need to apply for permits for experiments. To be approved, studies would have to be aimed at species survival and recovery.

[...] Writing to PETA on 1 March, FWS promised to "consider your petition request promptly," and assess whether ESA protection is warranted for each species. There is precedent indicating that the agency might agree with PETA. In 2015, it designated captive chimpanzees as endangered, like their wild counterparts. In doing so, it wrote that its reading of the ESA indicated that "Congress did not intend for captive specimens of wildlife to be subject to separate legal status on the basis of their captive state."

PETA's Goodman says a listing change would allow animal rights activists to better track—and challenge—research involving captive Japanese macaques. When a researcher applies for a permit to conduct an experiment on a species listed under ESA, the application is published in the Federal Register and open to public comment. That means, says Goodman, "We have the opportunity to stop experiments before they happen. And we have more information as to what the animals are actually being used for, how invasive the experiments are."

The Japanese macaques, also known as snow monkeys, have been housed at the Oregon center, part of Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), since 1965. The troop has provided animal models for multiple sclerosis and for an inherited form of age-related macular degeneration, a leading cause of human blindness. Ongoing work studies the effects on offspring when pregnant dams are fed a high-fat diet. Several years ago, some males were castrated and received hormone replacement to study the effect of androgens on neurons thought to motivate aggressive behavior. Females with their ovaries removed have been used to study the effects of hormone replacement therapy on stress and anxiety, with potential applications to mood and stress in menopausal women.

[...] FWS designated the wild Japanese macaque as threatened in 1976, because the Japanese forests needed for its survival had been heavily logged.

Note: PETA = People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Wikipedia page)

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/us-considers-designating-300-primates-oregon-research-center-threatened

Related:
Ebola Vaccine for Great Apes Hindered by Chimpanzee Research Restrictions


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 10 2017, @09:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 10 2017, @09:35PM (#477550)

    Definition of Animal
    Under Section 2(g) of the AWA (7 U.S.C. 2132(g)), the term animal includes, with certain exceptions, any live or dead dog, cat, monkey (nonhuman primate mammal), guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warmblooded animal, as the Secretary may determine is being used, or is intended for use for research, teaching, testing, experimentation, or exhibition purposes, or as a pet. The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–171, signed into law on May 13, 2002), included provisions that amended the definition of animal in the AWA by specifically excluding birds, rats of the genus Rattus, and mice of the genus Mus, bred for use in research. In this document, we are amending the definition of animal in the regulations to be consistent with the definition of animal in the AWA.

    Prior to the effective date of this final rule, the definition of animal in 9 CFR 1.1 excluded rats of the genus Rattus and mice of the genus Mus bred for use in research, as well as all birds (i.e., not just those birds bred for use in research). As a result, this final rule will narrow the scope of the exclusion for birds to only those birds bred for use in research. This final rule is intended only to make the definition of animal in the regulations consistent with the definition of animal in the AWA.

    https://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/animal-welfare-act [usda.gov]
    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2004-06-04/pdf/04-12693.pdf [gpo.gov]