Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday March 11 2017, @08:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the because-aliens dept.

Since their discovery ten years ago, fast radio bursts have confounded astronomers. These intergalactic pulses of radio energy have defied explanation, but a new theory suggests a technological origin, whereby aliens use these beams to propel their ships through space. Extremely speculative stuff, to be sure, but it's an idea worth pursuing given just how weird these pulses are.

The idea that Fast Radio Bursts are produced by advanced alien civilizations in order to drive spacecraft through interstellar space sounds like something a UFO conspiracy site might cook up—but it's actually the serious suggestion of a new paper published by Avi Loeb and Manasvi Lingam from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Of course, much more evidence is needed before we can attribute this unexplained phenomenon to artificial sources versus a natural astrophysical process.

With no good theory to go by, Loeb and Lingam wondered if extraterrestrials might be involved—and not without good reason. In a word, FRBs are weird. Like really weird.

http://gizmodo.com/wild-new-theory-suggests-radio-bursts-beyond-our-galaxy-1793130515

Additional coverage at ScienceBlog.com and Phys.org

Source: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Journal Abstract: Fast Radio Bursts from Extragalactic Light Sails


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by sgleysti on Saturday March 11 2017, @07:46PM (3 children)

    by sgleysti (56) Subscriber Badge on Saturday March 11 2017, @07:46PM (#477839)
    My coworker came up with a very non-standard mechanism to mount an incredibly accurate rotary encoder. In order for this to work, the mount must prevent the encoder from rotating about its axis. Our conversation went like this:
     
    Me: This looks suspect; prove to me that it won't allow the encoder to rotate about its axis.
    Him: It's fine. Prove to me that it will.
    Me: You're the one making the claim; don't you have the burden of proof?
    Him: *shrugs* What can I say? It's my project.
     
    I fiddled with it for a few minutes and found a situation where the mount allowed the encoder would rotate about its axis, introducing large measurement errors. He subsequently came up with a better way to mount it. If he possessed a scientific mindset/epistomology, he would have thought through possible problems with the first mechanism, found them, and tried new ideas until he settled on one he could prove would work.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 12 2017, @04:06AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 12 2017, @04:06AM (#477925)

    Sounds more like an ego that wants to protect itself. People are more likely to "science" other people's ideas.

    • (Score: 2) by sgleysti on Sunday March 12 2017, @04:19AM (1 child)

      by sgleysti (56) Subscriber Badge on Sunday March 12 2017, @04:19AM (#477928)

      Sure, but the better route to ego protection is criticizing and testing one's own ideas and then improving them.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 12 2017, @10:08PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 12 2017, @10:08PM (#478225)

        no, it's to blame others for causing your failures and then trying to diminish any successes they may have.

        wait you're a democrat right