Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday March 14 2017, @06:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the this-never-happened-on-the-silk-road dept.

The police chief in Wilmington, North Carolina, has publicly lambasted one of his officers. The officer recently pulled over a local attorney moonlighting as an Uber driver and told the driver that he could not film the traffic stop.

"Taking photographs and videos of people that are in plain sight, including the police, is your legal right," Chief Ralph Evangelous said in a Wednesday statement published on the department's Facebook page. "As a matter of fact, we invite citizens to do so when they believe it is necessary. We believe that public videos help to protect the police as well as our citizens and provide critical information during police and citizen interaction."

The statement concluded: "A copy of this statement will be disseminated to every officer within the Wilmington Police Department."

During the February 26 traffic stop, Jesse Bright began filming Sgt. Kenneth Becker when he and other law enforcement officers approached his car. Sgt. Becker, who appeared to be wearing a VieVu body-worn camera, told Bright that a "new law" forbids citizens from filming encounters with police.

"Turn it off or I'll take you to jail," Becker said.

"For recording you?" Bright retorted. "What is the law?"

The officers were unable to cite him the "new law," as it does not exist.

Source: ArsTechnica


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday March 14 2017, @07:42PM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Tuesday March 14 2017, @07:42PM (#479097) Homepage
    Typographic convention is italics for names of works in your example titles. I try to always use the ASCII equivalent.
    If you mention /Mr and Mrs Smith/, you are referring to the movie and resumably, /Lark Rise to Candleford/ is a TV series.
    People who like HTML in their posts can, I am led to believe, do the real thing.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by gidds on Wednesday March 15 2017, @12:34PM (1 child)

    by gidds (589) on Wednesday March 15 2017, @12:34PM (#479359)

    I use ASCII conventions for /italics/, *bold*, and _underline_ myself.

    But it seems a bit redundant to use two separate conventions (italics and capitalisation) to indicate titles!  If you're using capitalisation anyway, why not use it fully and remove the need for anything else?

    --
    [sig redacted]
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 15 2017, @05:08PM

      by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Wednesday March 15 2017, @05:08PM (#479489) Homepage
      Let's assume "The Title" is the title of the work. In the work itself, as the title, it is not italicised. It is, however, title-cased.
      /The Title/ *refers to* the work, using its title. And as the title is title-cased, it too is title-cased when being referred to.
      Note also that refering to the title - "The Title" - would not be italicised, as it's not a reference to the work, but a reference to the sequence of words that is the title of the work.

      You may need to re-read /Godel Escher Bach/ if the above appears confusing, there's a whole chapter devoted to the difference between things and how you refer to things (including referring to names (that in turn refer to things)) in there, IIRC.

      For reference, my company does proofreading for governments, academics (authors and journals), standards bodies, ... . We've seen a hundred different conventions, but in general they overlap an awful lot. (References being the exception, no 2 bodies agree with each other.)
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves