Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday March 14 2017, @08:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the roll-with-it dept.

This unique concept unlocks the potential for electricity generation in low volume waterways such as a stream or a brook. Opening up a whole range of unexplored sources of sustainable energy in many areas of the world. The rolling fluid turbine is a viable alternative to conventional hydroelectric generators, which have been providing power from water since they were developed in the 1880s. Typically hydroelectric power requires a huge head of water to function, relying on blades submerged in high-velocity water streams. The rolling fluid turbine relies on physics to convert water's natural flow into upward pressure to generate electricity, this promises to change how water current is transformed into electrical power.

This is achieved by exploiting a unique hydrodynamic principle, the rolling fluid principle vortex dynamic, which can create a large amount of energy. This is achieved by using the naturally occurring suction of water by driving it through a specially shaped turbine casing, Sedlacek and his team have managed to generate power with an output of up to 10 kWh per day at 60% efficiency from a small turbine. This is enough power to meet the requirements of 5 European families or an entire African village.

The invention is a tubular canister that floats like a buoy on the surface of a small body of water. Beneath the surface, the natural flow of water is directed through a tube driving the water pressure upwards with increased suction as a result of the vortex principle. Inside the turbine shaft, the vortex energy rotates a cup mounted on a generator shaft that converts the rotation into electrical energy.

When installed in a slow moving stream, the turbine can generate energy for a small house at levels of up to 400 watts. Ideally, the bladeless turbine operates more effectively at flow levels of 22 to 250 litres per second, but it can produce results in flow rates as low as 2 L/sec.

The mechanism is unclear, but other designs exist that convert low-head flow into electricity.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by UncleSlacky on Tuesday March 14 2017, @10:54AM (4 children)

    by UncleSlacky (2859) on Tuesday March 14 2017, @10:54AM (#478852)

    From https://www.thoughtco.com/viktor-schauberger-1992456 [thoughtco.com]

    "Viktor Schauberger was an Austrian inventor and naturalist who built and patented a water ram pump involving a spiral flow which he claimed to have learned from a visit to the Egyptian pyramid. Schauberger is considered the father of implosion technology. Many of his inventions are based on his study of fluidic vortexes."

    See also http://schauberger.co.uk/articles/ [schauberger.co.uk]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Tuesday March 14 2017, @03:30PM (3 children)

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Tuesday March 14 2017, @03:30PM (#478953) Journal

    Good call. A friend linked me a fascinating 2008 documentary [youtube.com] (IMDB [imdb.com]) about his ideas, work, and life a couple months ago. The segment towards the end covers some modern work towards attempting to build an electric generator based on his design.

    “Die Natur kapieren und kopieren.”

    At the very least, any Gurren Lagann fans here ought to appreciate spiral energy!

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by delt0r on Wednesday March 15 2017, @12:33AM

      by delt0r (4778) on Wednesday March 15 2017, @12:33AM (#479217)

      the only problem is that its all far worse than existing designs that are already 90% + efficient. And if you have a small head (small drop) then Archimedes spirals do the trick with good efficiency. Basically its a case of "look i see patterns" without running the numbers properly. That is why they have problems getting them to work at all.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 15 2017, @08:55AM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Wednesday March 15 2017, @08:55AM (#479314) Homepage
      I've watched 3 minutes, and it's complete non-scientific woo-woo so far.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 15 2017, @09:50AM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Wednesday March 15 2017, @09:50AM (#479323) Homepage
        It took 3015 seconds of listening to sometimes not-even-wrong non-science before it all became clear - "Hal Puthoff", one of the kings of woo-woo, came into the story. At least he was prepared to say "shit don't work", and if he's prepared to dismiss something, you can be pretty sure that there's less than zero chance of it working. (Zero chance is good enough for him to continue wasting time on things.) These kinds of "documentaries" are damaging, as they appear to be scientific, but they're nothing of the sort, they are throwing scientific-looking word salad around, that's all.
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves