Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday March 14 2017, @08:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the dangerous-posturing dept.

Reuters reports:

Japan plans to dispatch its largest warship on a three-month tour through the South China Sea beginning in May, three sources said, in its biggest show of naval force in the region since World War Two. China claims almost all the disputed waters and its growing military presence has fueled concern in Japan and the West, with the United States holding regular air and naval patrols to ensure freedom of navigation.

The Izumo helicopter carrier, commissioned only two years ago, will make stops in Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka before joining the Malabar joint naval exercise with Indian and U.S. naval vessels in the Indian Ocean in July.

President of the Philippines Rodrigo Duterte said he may visit the warship. The Chinese navy plans to "shadow" foreign military vessels and aircraft. The U.S. is deploying an attack drone to South Korea to respond to recent North Korean missile launches.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday March 14 2017, @09:12PM (3 children)

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday March 14 2017, @09:12PM (#479138)

    The Chinese want the islands, and the exclusive fishing and mining rights around them.

    I may have missed every single report that random cargo ships weren't allowed "freedom of navigation" nearby, but it doesn't fit the Chinese needs, so why would they bother?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 15 2017, @07:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 15 2017, @07:56PM (#479550)

    Military ships count too.

    The other nearby countries would also like to own those fishing rights. Failing that, they'd like to share (international waters) or have an off-limits area that might serve as a breeding ground.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday March 15 2017, @11:29PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Wednesday March 15 2017, @11:29PM (#479606) Journal

    China doesn't just want the existing islands. China is building islands:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mischief_Reef [wikipedia.org]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiery_Cross_Reef [wikipedia.org]

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday March 15 2017, @11:48PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday March 15 2017, @11:48PM (#479613)

      "Islands" was almost hyperbolic for what was mostly inhospitable rocks and reefs ...
      To achieve proper fait accompli, and guarantee that any competing claim (or international judgement) wouldn't be easily enforced, the Chinese needed enough room for a bunch of military equipment, including airstrips to conduct patrols.