Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday March 14 2017, @10:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the twice-in-a-generation dept.

Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is seeking another vote on Scottish independence, coming possibly as soon as late 2018:

In a bombshell announcement Monday, Scottish leader Nicola Sturgeon told reporters in Edinburgh that she will seek the authority to hold a second independence referendum for Scotland. Citing a "brick wall of intransigence" from British Prime Minister Theresa May, Sturgeon asserted that the only way to preserve Scottish interests in the midst of the U.K. exit from the European Union is to put matters directly in the hands of Scottish voters.

"What Scotland deserves, in the light of the material change of circumstances brought about by the Brexit vote, is the chance to decide our future in a fair, free and democratic way — and at a time when we are equipped with the facts we need," the Scottish first minister and head of the Scottish National Party said in prepared remarks. "Whatever path we take, it should be one decided by us, not for us."

Next week, she will seek a section 30 order from the Scottish Parliament to begin the referendum process — which the U.K. Parliament in Westminster ultimately must approve. If all goes as planned, Sturgeon expects that a vote would be held in the fall of 2018 or spring of 2019, after terms of a Brexit deal worked out by the U.K. and the EU become clear.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday March 14 2017, @09:06PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday March 14 2017, @09:06PM (#479135)

    As I already replied above, people are angry for many reasons, some homegrown, some EU-based, some totally foreign, and leaving is he easiest knee-jerk reaction but not the wisest.

    The extent of "punishments" for someone leaving is limited to treating them no better than Somalia on trade/customs/immigration matters.
    It's the country leaving the Union who is asking to retain a preferential status (leave the club, but keep a key), and the worst punishment is to slam the door on their ass (with the consequence of losing trade with them). WTO rules pretty much prevent going very far beyond that.

    The EU has a vested interest in people understanding that tantrums don't get rewarded, and the "leave" energy should be directed at fixing the EU problems instead.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2