A company that refused to pay its delivery drivers overtime for years has lost its bid to be a cheapskate, to the tune of $10,000,000. The 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals (decision-pdf) interpreted an exception to OT laws with special care to a meaningful but missing comma. Specifically, the phrase existing in the statute is:
"..., packing for shipment or distribution of:"
The company wanted the phrase to be interpreted as:
"..., packing for shipment, or distribution of:"
Without the comma, the activity excluded from coverage is "packing". With the comma present, it would have excluded packing or distribution.
The law as it exists in all its commaless glory:
The canning, processing, preserving, freezing, drying, marketing, storing, packing for shipment or distribution of:
(1) Agricultural produce;
(2) Meat and fish products; and
(3) Perishable foods.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 18 2017, @06:03PM (1 child)
Your list-fu needs work. Try this --
For any or all of the following operations: [establish the "or" before starting the list]
1. Canning
...
9. Distribution
Pertaining to these products:
...
Simple lists don't have semicolons inside them (at least not when I write the list!)
I wonder if the paragraph & comma/semi format started back when paper and printing was expensive? Now that forms are mostly distributed electronically, expanding a long sentence into a vertical list for readability doesn't waste paper.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday March 19 2017, @05:29AM
expanding a long sentence into a vertical list for readability doesn't waste paper.
Nor does it make it more readable.