Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday March 20 2017, @05:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-makin'-babies dept.

A review has reiterated that oral contraception is safe and effective for adolescent females, and found that negative side effects are rarer among teens than adult users. The review also found no evidence linking the use of oral contraceptives to increased or riskier sex:

Nearly five years ago, the nation's leading group of obstetricians and gynecologists issued a policy statement saying the time had come for oral contraception to be available without a prescription. We wrote about it and everything.

In the intervening years, some states have changed their laws. California authorized pharmacists to distribute most types of hormonal birth control. Oregon passed a similar law covering both pills and patches. But neither law changed the status of birth control pills from prescription to over-the-counter. Only the Food and Drug Administration can do that. And in Oregon's case, the law does not apply to people of all ages. People under 18 are still required to get their first contraceptive prescription from a doctor.

But researchers say there is no evidence that adolescents are at greater risk from birth control pills than adult women. A review of oral contraceptive research [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.12.024] [DX] presents the most comprehensive evidence yet that, as the authors state, "There is no scientific rationale for limiting access to a future over-the-counter oral contraceptive product by age."

"There is a growing body of evidence that the safety risks are low and benefits are large," says Krishna Upadhya, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the lead author of the review, which was published this week in the Journal of Adolescent Health. In fact, she says, some of the potential negative side effects of oral contraception are less likely in younger people. For example, birth control pills that contain both estrogen and progestin come with an increased risk of a type of blood clot called a venous thromboembolism, but that risk is lower in teenagers than in older women. As a result, the pill is "potentially safer the younger you are," says Upadhya.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @06:43PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @06:43PM (#481669)

    That's the whole point of insurance: Risk management.

    I'm not your slave.

    Insurance pays for that catastrophe which happens to an individual despite the individual doing everything possible to prevent that catastrophe.

    It is NOT meant for everyday payments that a semi-sentient being should handle for himself; insurance is NOT a payment network.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by bob_super on Monday March 20 2017, @06:54PM (1 child)

    by bob_super (1357) on Monday March 20 2017, @06:54PM (#481679)

    Insurance companies like the Pill: a second-layer insurance against having to pay a lot of OB bills.

    Pregnancy is insured, and extremely costly. Preventing that risk at minimal cost is the insurance's job. Paying for the pill is essentially a savings for them.

    What's the link to slavery, especially as it actually can reduce your premiums (actually does raise their profits instead).

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @07:00PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @07:00PM (#481681)

      Maybe there could be an insurance policy for people who agree never to have children.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @10:48PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @10:48PM (#481828)

    > catastrophe

    Ah, your hang up is with the word "insurance."
    If we stop calling it health insurance and start calling it health care all your arguments go away.
    Well, no they won't because inside your head you keep thinking "insurance" but if you weren't hung up on it, they would.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @11:59PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 20 2017, @11:59PM (#481865)

      The problem is that the insurance industry has been abused by government into becoming a payment network for the health care INDUSTRY; it's not possible to have a market when the market is systematically hidden in order to benefit special interests.