Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday March 21 2017, @12:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the I'll-determine-what's-sensitive dept.

ISPs that want the federal government to eliminate broadband privacy rules say that your Web browsing and app usage data should not be classified as "sensitive" information.

"Web browsing and app usage history are not 'sensitive information,'" CTIA said in a filing with the Federal Communications Commission yesterday. CTIA is the main lobbyist group representing mobile broadband providers such as AT&T, Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile USA, and Sprint.

The FCC rules passed during the Obama administration require ISPs to get opt-in consent from consumers before sharing sensitive customer information with advertisers and other third parties. The FCC defined Web browsing history and app usage history as sensitive information, along with other categories such as geo-location data, financial and health information, and the content of communications. If the rules are overturned, ISPs would be able to sell this kind of customer information to advertisers.

The opt-in rules are scheduled to take effect on or after December 4, 2017, but ISPs have petitioned the FCC to eliminate the rules before that happens. The latest CTIA filing was a reply to groups that opposed the petition to overturn the rules.

In making its argument that Web browsing and app usage history are not sensitive information, CTIA said that the Federal Trade Commission has taken a different stance than the FCC.

"To justify diverging from the FTC's framework and defining Web browsing history as 'sensitive,' the commission and the [privacy rule supporters] both cherry-picked evidence in an attempt to show that ISPs have unique and comprehensive access to consumers' online information," CTIA wrote. "As the full record shows, however, this is simply not true. Indeed, even a prominent privacy advocacy organization asserted that it is 'obvious that the more substantial threats for consumers are not ISPs,' but rather other large edge providers."

Source: ArsTechnica


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheGratefulNet on Tuesday March 21 2017, @02:22PM (3 children)

    by TheGratefulNet (659) on Tuesday March 21 2017, @02:22PM (#482145)

    had them - worked for a while and them had to dump them.

    they time-out after exactly 1 hour. you have to 'redial' every hour to keep the connection up.

    they are in the UK. nuff said! ... ;(

    comcast seems to mess with their connection. could not get it to work after I moved to a new location.

    I have another vpn that works fine. the 'london trust' is anything but trust. sorry, but if its uk-based, its nanny-state based and cannot be trusted.

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 21 2017, @03:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 21 2017, @03:48PM (#482202)

    No problems here. Several years now. Also on comcast.

  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Tuesday March 21 2017, @07:30PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Tuesday March 21 2017, @07:30PM (#482333) Journal

    Have never had a problem in the 2-3 years i've used them (and am renewing soon).

    I've had it run all day and night without a problem.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 1) by purple_cobra on Thursday March 23 2017, @12:13PM

    by purple_cobra (1435) on Thursday March 23 2017, @12:13PM (#483182)

    Funny you should mention that...
    I use a different VPN provider and had exactly the same issue. They were as bemused as I was and had no idea of a potential cause, telling me repeatedly it wasn't anything they'd set at their end. While poking through the router settings - an Asus AC66U running Merlin's firmware - I see a warning that it hadn't synchronised its time via NTP. There's some weirdness going on in the code that hasn't been conclusively fixed IIRC, but a helpful soul on the support forum had posted a cron script to sync NTP every so often, something I tried if only to make sure the logs were accurate.
    The point of this rambling explanation is that after the time was fixed, the VPN disconnects stopped happening too!
    This could be a coincidence, of course, but I wonder if a persistent timestamp mismatch was causing the server end to drop the connection after a default period? Worth checking your router, at least.