Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday March 21 2017, @06:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-that-Gary-Larson dept.

Police in a small suburban town of 50,000 people just outside Minneapolis, Minnesota, have won a court order requiring Google to determine who has used its search engine to look up the name of a local financial fraud victim.

The court order demanding such a massive search is perhaps the most expansive one we've seen unconnected to the US national security apparatus and, if carried out, could set an Orwellian precedent in a bid by the Edina Police Department to solve a wire-fraud crime worth less than $30,000.

Investigators are focusing their probe on an online photo of someone with the same name of a local financial fraud victim. The image turned up on a fake passport used to trick a credit union to fraudulently transfer $28,500 out of an Edina man's account, police said. The bogus passport was faxed to the credit union using a spoofed phone number to mimic the victim's phone, according to the warrant application. (To protect the victim's privacy, Ars is not publishing his name that was listed throughout the warrant signed February 1 by Hennepin County Senior Judge Gary Larson.)

The warrant demands Google to help police determine who searched for variations of the victim's name between December 1 of last year through January 7, 2017. A Google search, the warrant application says, reveals the photo used on the bogus passport. The image was not rendered on Yahoo or Bing, according to the documents. The warrant commands Google to divulge "any/all user or subscriber information"—including e-mail addresses, payment information, MAC addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth, and IP addresses—of anybody who conducted a search for the victim's name.

Source: ArsTechnica


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 21 2017, @08:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 21 2017, @08:33PM (#482378)

    Agreed, but can we pause for a moment on the request that Google turn in "Social Security Numbers" and even birth dates, alongside the expected email/IP/MAC addresses.

    That Google would be expected to have linked the SSN of someone doing an image search is highly troubling, and the whole SSN concept should be revised quickly...

    IANAL and I haven't seen the warrant but I suspect the gist of the request is that Google turn over all relevant personally identifiable information on those doing a google search on the victim. It doesn't necessarily mean that google actually has such information, only that they need to turn it over if they have it. On the other hand, I would think it a bit disturbing if google actually was collecting SSN, birth dates, etc. on people doing google searches, no matter what they were searching for. But that seems to me to be a substantially different matter from turning over whatever they have which is related to this police investigation.