Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday March 22 2017, @11:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the microwaving-the-books dept.

This article http://buffalonews.com/2017/03/17/ub-professor-discovers-investors-really-care/ is a review of the new book, "The End of Accounting and the Path Forward for Investors and Managers." After reviewing hundreds of earnings conference calls, the authors have concluded that investors are much more interested in the future than in current returns (traditional measures like earnings per share, etc).

A couple of quotes from the interview with author Feng Gu:

Financial analysts are widely regarded as the most sophisticated investors. They spend their whole life and career tracking the performance of publicly traded companies. Their main job is to help investors understand the performance and the changing risk of each company, so this way investors can make decisions about whether or not they want to invest in a given company.

It turned out the majority of analysts' questions and interests are not along the line of traditional financial reports. So for example, when a company like Sirius XM comes out with its quarterly earnings, the CEO or CFO starts with a quick mention of the earnings per share, which is really one of the key numbers that is included in companies' financial reports. Quickly, everybody forgets about earnings per share and they talk about something else that is not required by the system financial reporting, that is not included in the standard financial reports. ... After reading 200, 300 such examples, we got a very clear sense that investors are not interested in what is included in the standard financial reports. They are interested in something more important, something that is not being reported by companies today.

I think in our book, we made a point very clear that regulators have to require companies to treat investment in their strategic assets as investment for accounting purposes. ... Most of the investment in strategic assets like R&D, advertising, branding and so on, are not being treated as an asset on the balance sheet of the company. They're being treated as just a one-time expense. ... This is the least that regulators can do to correct the information problem that we have documented and other people have documented.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by rondon on Wednesday March 22 2017, @12:21PM (1 child)

    by rondon (5167) on Wednesday March 22 2017, @12:21PM (#482670)

    While I don't think VLM said it in a very concise way, I do agree with his last point overall - more "estimates" in the balance sheet is probably a bad thing. On top of that, allowing companies to capitalize more expenses is probably bad as well, as it will lead to much, much easier manipulation of the financial statements.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by Dale on Wednesday March 22 2017, @03:07PM

    by Dale (539) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 22 2017, @03:07PM (#482750)

    My first thought was "oh so they can hide long term expenses through capitalization" when I read it too. Nothing has ever gone wrong with people abusing that before (/sarcasm).

    Perrhaps they should consider that the financial statements are not exclusively a tool for financial speculation for stock trading.