Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday March 22 2017, @11:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the i-resign dept.

Movies and television shows are full of blunders, some more noticeable than others, and each with their specific guild of victims. Ornithologists fume when British period dramas are overdubbed with American birdsongs. Government employees will tell you that the supposed main White House staffer in Contact has a nonexistent job. Archeologists hate movie shipwrecks, and marine biologists are already mad about the zombie sharks in the upcoming Pirates of the Caribbean installment, which, as cartilaginous fishes, should not have ribs—even ghostly ones.

But these are merely occasional grievances. There's one group of experts who can barely flip on the television without being exposed to egregious, head-on-desk mistakes: chess players.

"There are a ton of chess mistakes in TV and in film," says Mike Klein, a writer and videographer for Chess.com. While different experts cite different error ratios, from "20 percent" to "much more often than not," all agree: Hollywood is terrible at chess, even though they really don't have to be. "There are so many [errors], it's hard to keep track," says Grandmaster Ilja Zaragatski, of chess24. "And there are constantly [new ones] coming out."

[...] Peter Doggers of Chess.com notes another Dramatic Checkmate move: the felled king. "Tipping over your king as a way of resigning the game is only done in movies," he says. (See Mr. Holland's Opus, in which Jay Thomas slaps his king down after being owned by Richard Dreyfuss).A normal chess player will just go in for a good-game-style handshake. "This falling king thing has somehow become a strong image in cinematography," he says, "But chess players always think: 'Oh no, there we go again...'"

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Thursday March 23 2017, @04:08PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Thursday March 23 2017, @04:08PM (#483265)

    Yeah, the inertial dampers can't fail that badly or else all the humans will be dead, and probably the ship will be crushed too. Even in ST:TNG, they had the concept of the "structural integrity field", which you can read about in the Technical Manual, and actually has to be running any time the ship is moving. They realized that with the g-forces in the maneuvers the ship was supposedly doing, that anything remotely like normal materials we have now would not be able to maintain structural integrity, so they invented the SIF to make it work. So when you see the crew being thrown around, the inertial dampers and SIF haven't actually *failed* outright, they're just not operating at 100%, so you could call it a "brown-out".

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2