Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday March 23 2017, @02:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the soylent-ftw dept.

The last decade or so has brought ample evidence that Americans are gradually changing their diets, driven by health concerns and other factors.

But a new study points to one change that is starker than many have thought: Americans cut their beef consumption by 19 percent — nearly one-fifth — in the years from 2005 to 2014, according to research to be released on Wednesday by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The environmental group found that consumption of chicken and pork fell as well, though less drastically, as Americans ate more cheese, butter and leafy greens.

The council is hailing the plummeting popularity of beef as a victory in the fight against climate change, because greenhouse gases are produced when cattle are raised. The group estimates that the resulting reduction in pollution would equal the emissions of 39 million cars, or about one-sixth of the number of cars registered in the United States in 2015. (Some of those environmental benefits, the group says, were erased by increased consumption of other foods that also create emissions.)

The research, which is based on data from the Agriculture Department and calculations using the same methodology as the Environmental Protection Agency, found that changes in the overall American diet reduced emissions by the equivalent of pollution from 57 million cars — despite population growth of about 9 percent.

I switched to eating people. Mmm, tasty.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by sjames on Thursday March 23 2017, @03:01PM (6 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Thursday March 23 2017, @03:01PM (#483234) Journal

    That probably has a lot more to do with it than anyone would care to admit.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by nobu_the_bard on Thursday March 23 2017, @03:25PM (2 children)

    by nobu_the_bard (6373) on Thursday March 23 2017, @03:25PM (#483248)

    Asked what prompted them to eat less beef, 37 percent of consumers surveyed cited its price as the No. 1 reason in research published in January by Mintel, a consumer research firm. Thirty-five percent of the respondents said they were eating more protein from other sources, like chicken or tofu. But more than a quarter ascribed the change to their concern about cholesterol and saturated fats.

    (Emphasis mine)

    The next two paragraphs, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association blames increased focus on exports (thus, less local supply) and more heated competition from other meats (particularly chicken and pork), as well as increasing prices due to feed cost increases.

    • (Score: 2) by SomeGuy on Thursday March 23 2017, @03:52PM (1 child)

      by SomeGuy (5632) on Thursday March 23 2017, @03:52PM (#483256)

      Price is a huge issue. The last 5 or 10 years prices have gone through the roof. Even a small package of market hamburger costs a fortune compared to other meats at places like Publix.

      It's no surprise that people don't buy as much any more. What will happen next is the industry will probably pull a Mozilla and stop selling beef because their automated metrics say "no one wants it any more".

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 23 2017, @04:00PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 23 2017, @04:00PM (#483261)

        Having recently gone to the US for a weekend vacation and picking up some lean ground beef to make some food with.

        It was quite a bit more expensive.

        Canada, for pound of lean ground I pay about $4. In the US cheapest I found was $6.40. This was in Vermont.

  • (Score: 2) by Sulla on Thursday March 23 2017, @04:26PM

    by Sulla (5173) on Thursday March 23 2017, @04:26PM (#483271) Journal

    When I started cooking for myself I found that it was a lot easier to work Pork/Chicken into dishes than it was to do so with Beef. I also find the taste of Beef less satisfying than the other two. That Beef is more expensive makes the decision all the easier.

    I can only speak for myself and those I know, but I make a lot more combination dishes (skillets/stir frys/fried rices) than I do traditional steak and potatoes. I am a caregiver for my grandmother, she scoffs when we make Pork/Chicken because Beef is so cheap compared to when she had to buy it and can't understand anyone not prefering Beef. So generational changes?

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
  • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Thursday March 23 2017, @08:48PM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Thursday March 23 2017, @08:48PM (#483388)

    Which is why politicians subsides the fuck out of beef production. You keep people with shit-tier burgers and they will vote.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday March 24 2017, @08:54AM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday March 24 2017, @08:54AM (#483571) Homepage
    I'm not so sure. I think it was during /Fast Food Nation/ when I saw a poor-ish family doing a food shop, and they claimed they had enough money for maccy-d's (containing beef) all round, but didn't have enough money for broccoli - the segment was attempting to answer the question "why don't you cook healthier meals for your family at home?" I think. The single foodstuff that got a whole sentence in the aborted shopping sequence was the broccoli, not the meat.

    (Of course, the family was talking shit, the broccoli wasn't that expensive at all, and it would have been trivial to afford a better meal from home-cooked meat and vegetables, they were simply lazy and didn't want to admit it.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves