Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 24 2017, @09:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the swale-idea dept.

If the sight of this winter's torrential rains left you pining for a way to capture the precious overflows, you are not alone.

UC Santa Cruz alum Daniel Mountjoy is working to do just that—on a scale that has the potential to ease the state's increasingly persistent cycles of deluge and drought.

The idea is to divert water from overflowing rivers onto fallow farmland, where it seeps into the soil and replenishes depleted aquifers. These "underground reservoirs" function like savings accounts, storing a valued resource for lean times.

"The goal is balance. We want to redirect surplus water, fill underground basins, and have that water available to farmers during drought years," says Mountjoy (BA, environmental studies, 1985), director of resource stewardship at Sustainable Conservation, a San Francisco-based nonprofit focused on solving resource management problems.

Mountjoy sees his role as facilitating a unique coalition—including farmers, environmentalists, academics, and water managers—that is developing and testing the strategy, called "on-farm recharge."

The strategy is in its infancy, but models show it has the capacity to capture enough river water between November and March to offset 20 percent of the annual "overdraft" pumped out of critical areas of the San Joaquin Valley.

Maybe they should follow the example of the ancient people on the Arabian Peninsula and build lots and lots of check dams.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 24 2017, @10:46PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 24 2017, @10:46PM (#483903)

    That's exactly what some countries do, large underground cisterns for each house. You can't do this in the USA though thanks to the EPA and other govt interfucktance.

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday March 24 2017, @10:49PM (3 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 24 2017, @10:49PM (#483904) Journal

    You can't do this in the USA though thanks to the EPA and other govt interfucktance.

    Really? Can you please provide a citation?
    (I'm not saying that it is not so, I'm saying I'd be grateful for a reference).

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by Arik on Friday March 24 2017, @11:58PM (2 children)

      by Arik (4543) on Friday March 24 2017, @11:58PM (#483928) Journal
      It seems to be a bit mangled. I'm not aware of any EPA involvement, specifically, in this one, and they're (at least mostly) regulated at the state or local level, not the federal. That said, they have been nearly abandoned in the states, for various reasons. In Western states in particular, water rights can be separate from land ownership, and historically tended the water tended to be claimed first, so collecting rainwater can amount stealing from the person who owns the water drainage, but that doesn't explain why they're so rare even in eastern states. They used to be standard features of houses, but somewhere around the 30s or 40s they became rare and then pretty much stopped being built entirely after that, in the US.
      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Saturday March 25 2017, @12:20AM (1 child)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Saturday March 25 2017, @12:20AM (#483945) Journal

        so collecting rainwater can amount stealing from the person who owns the water drainage,

        What the hell is the property of "the person who owns the water drainage" is doing on my property?
        Who allowed it there?

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 2) by Arik on Saturday March 25 2017, @11:00AM

          by Arik (4543) on Saturday March 25 2017, @11:00AM (#484074) Journal
          Well it went something like this.

          The first settlers that moved into arid areas wound up claiming relatively large amounts of land and working relatively little of it. This may seem wasteful and/or greedy at first glance but in fact it was necessary. You collect water over a large area in order to farm or ranch a small area, there's no other way to do it, water is a scarce commodity in these areas. So maybe the first family of settlers claimed this gigantic area in order to get enough water to run a relatively small operation, and operated like that for years. Then demand for housing reached the area, and the land was sold without the water rights, because the rancher or farmer didn't actually need that land for their operation, other than the water running off it. The buyer agreed to not interfere with that and got a much lower price as a result.

          That's oversimplified of course but you get the idea.
          --
          If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday March 25 2017, @12:04AM (1 child)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday March 25 2017, @12:04AM (#483932) Homepage

    My old house, in California has a cistern fed by the network of canals and pressurized by a small pump sitting in the backyard. Could drink the tap water without getting sick as well.

    Of course, many people even in this state think California is one big San Fagcisco.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by bob_super on Saturday March 25 2017, @12:45AM

      by bob_super (1357) on Saturday March 25 2017, @12:45AM (#483962)

      San Fagsisco on the left coast, New Fascisco on the right coast...