SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
In a filing, prosecutors have said that they are currently extracting data from locked phones seized from over 100 alleged rioters:
In new filings, prosecutors told a court in Washington, DC that within the coming weeks, they expect to extract all data from the seized cellphones of more than 100 allegedly violent protesters arrested during the inauguration of President Donald Trump. Prosecutors also said that this search is validated by recently issued warrants. [...] "All of the Rioter Cell Phones were locked, which requires more time-sensitive efforts to try to obtain the data," Jennifer Kerkhoff, an assistant United States attorney, wrote.
Also at BuzzFeed, CNET, and The Verge.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Data From the Phones of Over 100 Alleged Inauguration Rioters to be Extracted
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 44 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
To be a kind of moral Unix, he touched the hem of Nature's shift.
-- Shelley
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 26 2017, @06:02PM (1 child)
Going back to the first Bush at minimum, every Republican candidate has been called racist and sexist. It gets old. Is there also a wolf? Would you like to cry "Wolf!" to warn us? Nobody cares anymore.
Specifically desiring a first black president or a first female president though... that couldn't be racist or sexist, could it? It's only showing preference for a race or sex, which isn't the same thing... as showing preference for a race or sex. Oh wait. Hmmm.
He could be racist for calling black people "superpredators"... oh wait, Hillary Clinton did that. He might be sexist for biting a woman while raping her... oh wait, Bill Clinton did that to Juanita Broderick. Um, ankle monitor and sex offender list?
Your other insults are also suspect. Dumb people don't turn $millions into $billions. He's such a cruel fascist that nobody dares say anything bad about him, right? Hillary wouldn't happen to fit the definition of "sociopath" now, would she? Oh, I just looked up the definition to be sure, and yeah... it's a description of her. It especially matches up with the reports from former secret service agents who had to deal with her, and with the "private position" and "public position".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 26 2017, @06:38PM
http://c8.alamy.com/comp/D18GJM/italian-anti-nixon-demonstrators-march-in-anticipation-of-president-D18GJM.jpg [alamy.com]
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cx557jPXAAQ26mz.jpg [twimg.com]
Calling Republicans nazi's is just what they do. If they read what a real nazi (aka the National Socialist German Workers' Party) is they would see it more closely aligns to their thought process. But that would mean being slightly introspective.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung [wikipedia.org]
What they really miss is that they are expendables. For example once Hitler was done with the brown shirts he ruthlessly eliminated them and replaced them with the SS. Stalin did similar things in Russia using the KGB. They somehow think they would be favored in the new regime. They would quickly realize they have been used they become a force against said new gov and must be taken care of before that happens. Why? They have already shown they can be bought and do not tolerate those who do not think exactly like them.
Nothing will happen to the Clintons. They could curb stomp a baby on live TV and the media would gaslight us into thinking the baby deserved it because it kinda smiled at Trump. If they actually wanted to get people to watch they would do real investigative journalism instead of the gotcha tabloid style BS they are doing now.
I would say she is more a overt narcissist with sociopath tendencies. But at that point we are just arguing semantics.