Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Monday March 27 2017, @02:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the rare-earths-are-not-rare dept.

An international team of researchers, led by the University of Delaware's Saleem Ali, says global resource governance and sharing of geoscience data is needed to address challenges facing future mineral supply.

Specifically of concern are a range of technology minerals, which are an essential ingredient in everything from laptops and cell phones to hybrid or electric cars to solar panels and copper wiring for homes. However, base metals like copper are also a matter of immense concern.

The research team, which included experts from academic, government and industrial institutions across five continents, the U.S., Europe, South Africa, Australia and South America, reported their findings today in a peer-reviewed paper in Nature.

"There are treaties on climate change, biodiversity, migratory species and even waste management of organic chemicals, but there is no international mechanism to govern how mineral supply should be coordinated," said Ali, the paper's lead author and Blue and Gold Distinguished Professor of Energy and Environment at UD.

The researchers reviewed data and demand forecasts on the sustainability of global mineral supplies in coming decades. The study showed that mining exploration is not keeping up with future demand for minerals and recycling in and of itself would not be able to meet the demand either.

Saleem H. Ali, et al. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature, 2017; 543 (7645): 367 DOI: 10.1038/nature21359

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 27 2017, @09:16AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 27 2017, @09:16AM (#484556)
    You miss the point. The point was that if one is considering mining in Mars he/she might as well mine it in the belt. Getting to the Mars _surface_ adds a lot to the costs. Mars doesn't have that much atmosphere so reliable aerobraking is not trivial. Getting back up again is even worse.

    The asteroids don't have to be densely packed. You just need to pick a few suitable asteroids to mine. The first to secure rights to the "juiciest" asteroids would be at a significant advantage.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Monday March 27 2017, @02:54PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday March 27 2017, @02:54PM (#484625)

    I didn't miss the point about the gravity well. You're missing *my* point: why bother going all the way to the belt when there's plenty of asteroids right here?