Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday March 27 2017, @05:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the seems-pretty-black-and-white-to-me dept.

A corporate squabble over printer toner cartridges doesn't sound particularly glamorous, and the phrase "patent exhaustion" is probably already causing your eyes to glaze over. However, these otherwise boring topics are the crux of a Supreme Court case that will answer a question with far-reaching impact for all consumers: Can a company that sold you something use its patent on that product to control how you choose to use after you buy it?

The case in question is Impression Products, Inc v Lexmark International, Inc, came before the nation's highest court on Tuesday.

As with many SCOTUS disputes, Lexmark is a devil-in-the-details case that could have wide-ranging implications for basically everyone who ever buys anything — so, all of us.

Here's the background: Lexmark makes printers. Printers need toner in order to print, and Lexmark also happens to sell toner.

Then there's Impression Products, a third-party company makes and refills toner cartridges for use in printers, including Lexmark's.

Lexmark, however, doesn't want that; if you use third-party toner cartridges, that's money that Lexmark doesn't make. So it sued, which brings us to the legal chain that ended up at the Supreme Court.

Source: Consumerist


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Monday March 27 2017, @09:20PM (2 children)

    by jmorris (4844) on Monday March 27 2017, @09:20PM (#484884)

    No, I'm proposing that the customers of these products come together and, since the manufacturers have no incentive to, propose a standard which they would all then mandate on their suppliers. In exactly the same way almost everything that gets standardized is done, one end or the other of the supply chain sees a benefit in ending a bunch of incompatible parts and standardizes. The only government mandate would be in the fact the U.S. government happens to buy a hell of a lot of toner for all the paperwork it smothers us with.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 27 2017, @09:34PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 27 2017, @09:34PM (#484897)

    Tomato tomato

    Using financial clout to force a standard is basically the same thing. It just makes you feel better because it is done with "market forces" and we all know you believe "market is God".

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 28 2017, @07:55AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 28 2017, @07:55AM (#485066)

      OMG! jmorris responding to our message! Aren't these messages supposed to be invisible to other Soylentils? No, you say? What would be the point, you say? Alright, point taken. But it does seriously undermine my self-estimation as an undercover SJW operative. I just hope we have done jmorris some good. He needs all the help any Soylentil could give him, poor bastard! [end unencoded message] SJW Central, please respond with further instuctions. Please use secure channel, this time? [end, end unencoded message]