A corporate squabble over printer toner cartridges doesn't sound particularly glamorous, and the phrase "patent exhaustion" is probably already causing your eyes to glaze over. However, these otherwise boring topics are the crux of a Supreme Court case that will answer a question with far-reaching impact for all consumers: Can a company that sold you something use its patent on that product to control how you choose to use after you buy it?
The case in question is Impression Products, Inc v Lexmark International, Inc, came before the nation's highest court on Tuesday.
As with many SCOTUS disputes, Lexmark is a devil-in-the-details case that could have wide-ranging implications for basically everyone who ever buys anything — so, all of us.
Here's the background: Lexmark makes printers. Printers need toner in order to print, and Lexmark also happens to sell toner.
Then there's Impression Products, a third-party company makes and refills toner cartridges for use in printers, including Lexmark's.
Lexmark, however, doesn't want that; if you use third-party toner cartridges, that's money that Lexmark doesn't make. So it sued, which brings us to the legal chain that ended up at the Supreme Court.
Source: Consumerist
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 28 2017, @07:55AM
OMG! jmorris responding to our message! Aren't these messages supposed to be invisible to other Soylentils? No, you say? What would be the point, you say? Alright, point taken. But it does seriously undermine my self-estimation as an undercover SJW operative. I just hope we have done jmorris some good. He needs all the help any Soylentil could give him, poor bastard! [end unencoded message] SJW Central, please respond with further instuctions. Please use secure channel, this time? [end, end unencoded message]