Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday March 28 2017, @02:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the good-cop,-bad-cop dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

In January 2013, police raided the home of a Cleveland drug dealer, saying in a search warrant that an informant had recently bought crack cocaine there.

But the drug dealer had surveillance cameras that proved the officers were lying. He gave the tapes to his lawyer, who showed the FBI. The feds then worked to uncover a massive scandal of a rogue street-crimes unit that robbed and framed drug suspects who felt they had no choice but plead guilty to fraudulent charges.

Four years later, authorities are still unwinding the damage.

Three cops who worked for the city of East Cleveland are in prison. Cases against 22 alleged drug dealers have been dismissed. Authorities are searching for another 21 people who are eligible to have their convictions tossed. On top of those injustices, there is a slim chance that any of them will be fully reimbursed, because the disgraced officers and their former employer don't have the money.

Source: NBC News


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Tuesday March 28 2017, @10:31PM (5 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 28 2017, @10:31PM (#485521) Journal

    You do have personal hire/fire power. So does everyone else in your locality. It's called a vote.

    And that's fine as long as my vote is the only one that counts and the results of my vote are immediately carried out without question. Keep in mind that I'm not talking about the usual tripe, my ass is supposedly on the line here with complete fiscal responsibility and possibly legal responsibility as well. Thus, I demand more power and control to reflect that supposed vastly enlarged responsibility.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 29 2017, @12:27AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 29 2017, @12:27AM (#485581)

    The only thing enlarged might be your forehead if you think you are special enough to deserve the power our president does not even have. You might want to look up the definition of the word 'hyperbole' it might be relevant. Your ass is safe since this whole idea is bogus. Relax, and take your meds it might help.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 29 2017, @03:12AM (3 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 29 2017, @03:12AM (#485639) Journal

      The only thing enlarged might be your forehead if you think you are special enough to deserve the power our president does not even have.

      Deserve? No. It's power commensurate to the responsibility. If you don't like me having that level of power, then don't try to give me that level of responsibility.

      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 29 2017, @11:32AM (2 children)

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Wednesday March 29 2017, @11:32AM (#485818) Homepage
        Will someone with a brain please give khallow's first 3 posts in this sub-thread a +1 insightful mod, and if you have any left over a -1 whatthefuckareyougibberingabout to the two ACs in between?

        If someone claims I have the power to bring about X, yet someone has equal power to prevent or undo X, then I do not have the power to bring about X, and that person's claims are utterly void.
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday March 30 2017, @12:56AM (1 child)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 30 2017, @12:56AM (#486275) Journal
          Thank you. Voting is a sort of control, but not a very responsive one by design.

          To use the inevitable car analogy, it's much easier to avoid wrapping your car around a tree, when it faithfully executes your intent (such as a jerk on the steering wheel moving you towards the center of the road and brakes that slow you down, should you be traveling at excessive speed) rather than having oh a 40% chance the vehicle does exactly the wrong thing instead.

          And how can anyone justify holding you completely responsible for an accident, when they force you into this dodgy vehicle that you have so little control over and which will zoom off the road in a few hundred yards no matter how frantically you flail at the steering wheel and stamp on the brake pedal?
          • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday March 30 2017, @09:09AM

            by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday March 30 2017, @09:09AM (#486397) Homepage
            On your analogy - did you ever encounter the gedenkenexperiment of democratic public transport? Every rider on the bus can play, you can put coins in that last a few minutes to keep playing, and you have your own steering wheel. Whichever direction is voted the most popular is taken by the actual driver. The bus can be stopped any time, for those who don't like where the bus is heading. I forget who proposed it, it wasn't a serious proposal (how would you ever get on the bus - you woulnd't know where to pick it up? (having said that, with new Uber tech, perhaps there's a way to include votes from people not yet on a vehicle to summon nearby vehicles)), it was more an illustration that democracy isn't necessarily a workable solution for every decision-making process.
            --
            Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves