Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday March 29 2017, @10:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-one's-leaving-until-we-have-unanimous-agreement dept.

The rise of populism has rattled the global political establishment. Brexit came as a shock, as did the victory of Donald Trump. Much head-scratching has resulted as leaders seek to work out why large chunks of their electorates are so cross.
...
The answer seems pretty simple. Populism is the result of economic failure. The 10 years since the financial crisis have shown that the system of economic governance which has held sway for the past four decades is broken. Some call this approach neoliberalism. Perhaps a better description would be unpopulism.

Unpopulism meant tilting the balance of power in the workplace in favour of management and treating people like wage slaves. Unpopulism was rigged to ensure that the fruits of growth went to the few not to the many. Unpopulism decreed that those responsible for the global financial crisis got away with it while those who were innocent bore the brunt of austerity.

2017 Davos says: The 99% should just try harder.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 29 2017, @04:05PM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 29 2017, @04:05PM (#485979) Journal

    "I think "big, international corporations and oligarchs" are just an Emmanuel Goldstein ruse, something to distract us with a two minute hate, while the true powers slowly take over."

    Actually, I think those corporations are just a front for the "true powers". Who are they, anyway? Well, look at "old money" first. Maybe some "new money" families count themselves among the elite, but the elite would look down on them.

    http://yournewswire.com/former-kissinger-ceo-says-the-world-is-run-by-30-families/ [yournewswire.com]

    https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/photos/the-world%E2%80%99s-richest-families-revealed/ss-BBmRgsr#image=1 [msn.com]

    Hmmmm - who owns Monsanto, anyway? No, I don't mean small time stock holders - who owns and controls Monsanto?

    http://naturalsociety.com/who-are-really-the-top-shareholders-of-monsanto/ [naturalsociety.com]
    People like to talk nasty about Hugh Grant, Monsanto’s CEO, and obviously a shareholder. The same goes for Bill Gates. He purportedly owns millions of shares of Monsanto stock as well. But who are the real owners of Monsanto? The answer might be shocking.

    The real owners of Monsanto stock are institutions, and people who hide behind those institutions, not individuals like Gates and Grant. According to multiple sources, five investment funds are the top shareholders in Monsanto, with the Vanguard Group, Inc. at the top. You can view the rest below.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Wednesday March 29 2017, @04:50PM

    by fritsd (4586) on Wednesday March 29 2017, @04:50PM (#486011) Journal

    Maybe add to that list some companies that are just NEVER in the news:

    Schlumberger [wikipedia.org] (everything you need to drill for oil),

    Cargill [wikipedia.org] (agribusiness on the scale of Soylent Green)

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 29 2017, @04:57PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 29 2017, @04:57PM (#486014) Journal
    Looking at the second link, which actually mentions families, virtually all of that list is new money, gained since 1900. The Saudis and Rothschilds are in a class to themselves (and I would put the Saudis and the Winchester House (the family of Queen Elizabeth II which wasn't mentioned in the article) well above the rest, including the Rothschilds).

    The real owners of Monsanto stock are institutions, and people who hide behind those institutions, not individuals like Gates and Grant. According to multiple sources, five investment funds are the top shareholders in Monsanto, with the Vanguard Group, Inc. at the top. You can view the rest below.

    I agree. I believe institutional investors are one of the key drivers for short term thinking in business today. It's not their money and hence, they ultimately aren't interested in the long term success of the business. But I don't think these people are "family". What I see here is the rise of the power of well-connected, unaccountable bureaucracies with government bureaucracies the worst of the lot.

    The NSA isn't trampling the civil liberties of the world because it is running errands for the Rothschilds or whatever. It's because they can.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 29 2017, @10:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 29 2017, @10:47PM (#486226)

    They even got their own "brand name" "designed" by their staff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonomy [wikipedia.org]