Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday March 30 2017, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the McKinsey-says dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Open source projects are by their nature intended to be welcoming, pulling in contributions from many different volunteers. But in reality, open source and the tech industry in general often lack diversity. Speaking at the Open Source Leadership Summit in February, Mozilla's Chief Innovation Officer Katharina Borchert told the crowd that working to bring ethnic, gender, and skill diversity to open source projects isn't just the right thing to do because of moral grounds, it's the right thing to do to make projects more successful.

Me, I beg to differ. Pretty sure success has to do with the diversity of thought/ideas rather than genetic diversity.

Source: https://www.linux.com/news/learn/chapter/open-source-management/2017/3/diverse-projects-more-successful


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31 2017, @06:40AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31 2017, @06:40AM (#486964) Journal

    Humans are very genetically diverse (with some inbred exceptions) and having an entire genome sequence would still not be enough to predict much with any certainty

    Unless, of course, that assertion is incorrect. It's worth noting that no one has actually done that study to confirm your claim. How many entire genome sequences available for study are there again? A glance at Wikipedia claims [wikipedia.org] that there were 69 publicly available whole genome sequences as of 2012.

    Meanwhile we do have studies that indicate otherwise, such as a couple of examples in my other reply [soylentnews.org].