Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday March 30 2017, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the McKinsey-says dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Open source projects are by their nature intended to be welcoming, pulling in contributions from many different volunteers. But in reality, open source and the tech industry in general often lack diversity. Speaking at the Open Source Leadership Summit in February, Mozilla's Chief Innovation Officer Katharina Borchert told the crowd that working to bring ethnic, gender, and skill diversity to open source projects isn't just the right thing to do because of moral grounds, it's the right thing to do to make projects more successful.

Me, I beg to differ. Pretty sure success has to do with the diversity of thought/ideas rather than genetic diversity.

Source: https://www.linux.com/news/learn/chapter/open-source-management/2017/3/diverse-projects-more-successful


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31 2017, @10:58AM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31 2017, @10:58AM (#487029) Journal

    Yes, they can make high probability guesses about geographic origin. But geography is not race.

    More than close enough for me, particularly given the destructive blow up they'd receive if they did claim ethnicity rather than geographic origin.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31 2017, @08:48PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31 2017, @08:48PM (#487319)

    > More than close enough for me, particularly given the destructive blow up they'd receive if they did claim ethnicity rather than geographic origin.

    Of course its enough for you, you are pretty fucking stupid after all.
    Unable to argue with the facts, you just assert that your politics is the truth.

    Don't you ever try to make an argument based on science again.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday April 01 2017, @02:48PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 01 2017, @02:48PM (#487626) Journal

      > More than close enough for me, particularly given the destructive blow up they'd receive if they did claim ethnicity rather than geographic origin.

      Of course its enough for you, you are pretty fucking stupid after all. Unable to argue with the facts, you just assert that your politics is the truth.

      So are you claiming that ethnicity has nothing to do with geographic origin or that scientists won't get dog piled if they say that there's a genetic element to ethnicity?

      And what is "politics" here? Making an argument that didn't fit with your biases. Sounds like a label that has nothing to do with the real deal.

      Don't you ever try to make an argument based on science again.

      Pretty dumb thing to say even considering the "fucking stupidity" I supposed did was a science-based argument. Instead of feebly attempting to discourage me from making science-based arguments, I have a better idea - how about you give science-based argument a try? It'll be good for you.