Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Sunday April 02 2017, @04:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the visit-the-scenic-algae-blooms-of-Antartica dept.

When spring arrives in the Arctic, both snow and sea ice melt, forming melt ponds on the surface of the sea ice. Every year, as global warming increases, there are more and larger melt ponds.

Melt ponds provide more light and heat for the ice and the underlying water, but now it turns out that they may also have a more direct and potentially important influence on life in the Arctic waters.

Mats of algae and bacteria can evolve in the melt ponds, which can provide food for marine creatures. This is the conclusion of researchers in the periodical, Polar Biology.

More information:
Heidi Louise Sørensen et al. Nutrient availability limits biological production in Arctic sea ice melt ponds, Polar Biology (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s00300-017-2082-7


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @05:30PM (9 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @05:30PM (#487969)

    There can be no nuanced discussion of the effects of a shifting climate. We must only shout endlessly about the anthrocentric causes and nothing else.

    Delete this.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @05:37PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @05:37PM (#487970)

    Have you ever been pounced on by a neurotoxic jellyfish?

    • (Score: 2) by Hartree on Sunday April 02 2017, @06:41PM (4 children)

      by Hartree (195) on Sunday April 02 2017, @06:41PM (#487991)

      Jellyfish mostly just float around or slowly swim. I've never seen one even hop, let alone pounce.

      • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:24PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:24PM (#488000)

        Warming is energy. Energy they can thrive on, increasing their numbers. More numbers means more mutations. More mutations means evolution. They will harness the increased energy and come out of the water. They will come for your families.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:35PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:35PM (#488004)

          Should we wake the Sheeple from their ten thousand year slumber?

        • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:58PM

          by Gaaark (41) on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:58PM (#488010) Journal

          And will they be orange with small tentacles/tendrils, or will they be slimy and made of cardboard (and have a mate who runs onto the tarmac to meet with King Neptune)?

          Yeah, yeah... Off topic politics...

          --
          --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by requerdanos on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:33PM

        by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 02 2017, @07:33PM (#488003) Journal

        Have you ever been pounced on by a neurotoxic jellyfish?

        Jellyfish mostly just float [or] swim. I've never seen one...pounce.

        Okay, fair enough. But it *feels* like you've been pounced on because that's kind of what's happening at the macro-biological level... The Jellyfish's cnidoblasts [howstuffworks.com] erupt towards its prey in a process that the linked site describes aptly like this: "The stinging cells spring out at the unwitting victim...."

        It's really pretty cool once you get over how much it hurts (speaking from experience).

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @08:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02 2017, @08:32PM (#488020)

    Project much?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03 2017, @01:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03 2017, @01:52PM (#488186)

    Oh piss off.

    Yes, more CO2 technically means more food for plants. Warmer temps mean previously too chilly areas may become agriculturely-friendly. Less sea ice means new fishing, oil, and gas grounds.

    Will any of those out weigh the droughts, the floodings, and greater than average storms? The loss of coastal property and the cost of repairing first and moving & replacing later? The increased habitat of tropical diseases and pests? The loss of biodiversity and potential collapse of ocean food chains (hope you like jellyfish!)?

    This research is not "increased CO2 and massively shifting ecological systems is fine because of this!"

    It's "So this is what could happen too."

  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday April 03 2017, @09:15PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday April 03 2017, @09:15PM (#488379)

    Change is bad. See: every conservative politician's platform for the last century.

    All the anthropocentric climate change alarmists are saying is: adjust your value-time horizon to see the change we are creating. Change will of course include good, but overall, people prefer the status quo to a guaranteed pile of change, misery, and potential new opportunities. Bird in the hand and all that.

    Also, change is often instigated by bad people for their own gain, see: every cartoon almost ever, from Marvel's Hydra through Lex Luthor in Superman III.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]