Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Monday April 03 2017, @11:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the pronounced-nucular dept.

Scientists at the MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory have devised an unconventional plan for accelerating the development of a small, safe, cheap nuclear reactor: they want to build a prototype that piggybacks on their existing facility.

Since the planned one-megawatt demonstration reactor would be incapable of sustaining a fission reaction on its own, the researchers believe they could avoid building a standalone experimental prototype, which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission generally requires. That site selection and licensing process can take a decade or longer, so the hope is that this approach could cost hundreds of millions of dollars less and take half as much time to build.

[...] The researchers specifically want to test designs for a small, transportable molten-salt-cooled reactor, intended for off-grid purposes such as generating electricity for remote villages or worksites. Molten-salt reactors, first researched in the 1950s, are a subject of growing interest in the field because of the potential they offer for greater safety and lower costs compared with traditional nuclear power plants.

http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/03/mit-wants-to-build-add-on-1-mw-sub.html

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603963/mits-nuclear-lab-has-an-unusual-plan-to-jump-start-advanced-reactor-research/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Monday April 03 2017, @09:09PM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Monday April 03 2017, @09:09PM (#488377) Journal

    there's soo much wrong with this.
    first off the "arm-chair" MIT scientists should get off their butts and go dig out the freaking
    uranium or thorium themselves instead of relying on sub-human work force in some red-mud village in africa, got it?

    WTF? Since when is Canada, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ausrtalia in africa? (together those four provide more than half of the world's uranium)

    But yeah, I guess the scientists in Massachusetts should visit the world's largest uranium mine, with that being the Canadian (Saskatchewan) Macarthur River Mine (provides 13% of world supplies). They deserve a vacation

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2