Four privacy-minded lawmakers have introduced legislation requiring law enforcement officials to obtain a warrant before searching phones belonging to US citizens, and prohibiting them from barring entry to Americans who decline to share their passwords at the border.
"Americans' Constitutional rights shouldn't disappear at the border," Senator Ron Wyden said in statement to BuzzFeed News. "By requiring a warrant to search Americans' devices and prohibiting unreasonable delay, this bill makes sure that border agents are focused on criminals and terrorists instead of wasting their time thumbing through innocent Americans' personal photos and other data."
[...] The bill would require law enforcement to establish probable cause before searching or seizing a phone belonging to an American. "Manual searches," in which a border agent flips through a person's stored pictures would be covered under the proposed law as well. But the bill does allow for broad emergency exceptions.
"The government should not have the right to access your personal electronic devices without probable cause," Rep. Polis told BuzzFeed news in a statement. "Whether you are at home, walking down the street, or at the border, we must make it perfectly clear that our Fourth Amendment protections extend regardless of location. This bill is overdue, and I am glad we can come together in a bicameral, bipartisan manner to ensure that Customs and Border Patrol agents don't continue to violate essential privacy safeguards."
Source: Buzzfeed
(Score: 4, Interesting) by NotSanguine on Wednesday April 05 2017, @07:53PM (1 child)
I've been making that point for years, it's absolutely true. The Constitution just speaks of the rights of the people.
It's not the law that says foreigners have no rights, but the law has to be applied by people, and we've become an ugly culture that no longer believes in rights or even understands them.
According to this analysis [findlaw.com]:
Given the above, I guess that those who are not residents of the U.S. shouldn't come here if they value their privacy.
That's sad.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 2) by Arik on Thursday April 06 2017, @01:15AM
Or anything else. The decision may be specific to privacy rights but the rationale implicates ALL human rights.
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?