Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday April 06 2017, @03:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the device-went-doormant dept.

Denis Grisak, the man behind the Internet-connected garage opener Garadget, is having a very bad week. Grisak and his Colorado-based company SoftComplex launched Garadget, a device built using Wi-Fi-based cloud connectivity from Particle, on Indiegogo earlier this year, hitting 209 percent of his launch goal in February. But this week, his response to an unhappy customer has gotten Garadget a totally different sort of attention.

On April 1, a customer who purchased Garadget on Amazon using the name R. Martin reported problems with the iPhone application that controls Garadget. He left an angry comment on the Garadget community board:

Just installed and attempting to register a door when the app started doing this. Have uninstalled and reinstalled iphone app, powered phone off/on - wondering what kind of piece of shit I just purchased here...

Shortly afterward, not having gotten a response, Martin left a 1-star review of Garadget on Amazon:

Junk - DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY - iPhone app is a piece of junk, crashes constantly, start-up company that obviously has not performed proper quality assurance tests on their products.

Grisak then responded by bricking Martin's product remotely, posting on the support forum:

Martin,

The abusive language here and in your negative Amazon review, submitted minutes after experiencing a technical difficulty, only demonstrates your poor impulse control. I'm happy to provide the technical support to the customers on my Saturday night but I'm not going to tolerate any tantrums.

At this time your only option is return Garadget to Amazon for refund. Your unit ID 2f0036... will be denied server connection. [Ed's Comment: As of Apr 5, Garadget have apologised for this action and have restored connectivity]

The exchange then went viral, being picked up by the Twitter account @internetofshit and rising to the top of Hacker News.

Source: ArsTechnica


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 06 2017, @05:30PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 06 2017, @05:30PM (#489741)

    Over on Hacker News and Slashdot (who both had articles about this a full day before this site BTW)

    I really don't get these kinds of comments, which pop up from time to time, because I don't get what their point is.

    More than likely a passive-aggressive way of pointing out that SN is frequently a day or two behind most other sites when it comes to posting current stories.

  • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Thursday April 06 2017, @09:40PM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Thursday April 06 2017, @09:40PM (#489862) Journal

    Offtopic rant: I don't give a flying fnck what /. does, or does not have. I do not visit that site. Either snark people are suggesting I *should* visit that site (hot news!), or they are telling everyone how "hip" they are (on a geek/nerd news comment site!?)
    Either way, it is, IMO, unnecessary, and possibly pathetic. Submit, comment, moderate, edit, participate. but try not to denigrate the site - it only makes you look small.

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex