Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday April 07 2017, @02:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the things-that-go-fast-and-go-boom dept.

Following reports of the use of chemical weapons in Syria, President Trump authorized the launch of Tomahawk cruise missiles against a base in Syria. The Russian government was notified prior to the launch as they have resources in the area that was attacked.

According to NBC News:

The United States launched dozens of cruise missiles Thursday night at a Syrian airfield in response to what it believes was Syria's use of banned chemical weapons that killed at least 100 people, U.S. military officials told NBC News.

Two U.S. warships in the Mediterranean Sea fired 59 Tomahawk missiles intended for a single target — Ash Sha'irat in Homs province in western Syria, the officials said. That's the airfield from which the United States believes the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad fired the banned weapons.

There was no immediate word on casualties. U.S. officials told NBC News that people were not targeted and that aircraft and infrastructure at the site were hit, including the runway and gas fuel pumps.

Also at Al Jazeera:

The United States has launched 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles against Syrian government targets in retaliation for what the Trump administration charges was a Syrian government chemical weapons attack that killed scores of civilians, a US official says.

The targets hit from US ships in the Mediterranean Sea included the air base in the central city of Homs from which the Syrian aircraft staged Tuesday's chemical weapons attack, the US official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.

[...] He [Trump] called on "civilised nations" to join US in "seeking to end the slaughter and bloodshed in Syria".

Syrian state TV said "American aggression targets Syrian military targets with a number of missiles".

The poison gas attack on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province on Tuesday killed at least 86 people, including 27 children, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

Turkey said samples from victims of Tuesday's attack indicate they were exposed to sarin, a highly toxic nerve agent.

The New York Times adds:

The Pentagon informed Russian military officials, through its established deconfliction channel, of the strike before the launching of the missiles, the official said, with American officials knowing when they did that that Russian authorities may well have alerted the Assad regime. "With a lot of Tomahawks flying, we didn't want to hit any Russian planes," he said.

[...] It was Mr. Trump's first order to the military for the use of force — other operations in Syria, Yemen and Iraq had been carried out under authorization delegated to his commanders — and appeared intended to send a message to North Korea, Iran and other potential adversaries that the new commander in chief was prepared to act, and sometimes on short notice.

The airstrikes were carried out less than an hour after the president concluded a dinner with Xi Jinping, the president of China, at Mar-a-Lago, sending an unmistakably aggressive signal about Mr. Trump's willingness to use the military power at his disposal.

Mr. Trump authorized the strike with no congressional approval for the use of force, an assertion of presidential authority that contrasts sharply with the protracted deliberations over the use of force by his predecessor, former President Barack Obama.

[...] Mr. Trump moved with remarkable speed, delivering the punishing military strike barely 72 hours after the devastating chemical attack that killed 80 people this week.

Wikipedia notes: Use of chemical weapons in the Syrian civil war .

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by bradley13 on Friday April 07 2017, @08:00AM (1 child)

    by bradley13 (3053) on Friday April 07 2017, @08:00AM (#490122) Homepage Journal

    So: After the US secretly started this mess, in an attempt to topple Assad, Assad is finally about to regain control of his country.

    So "someone" drops sarin gas on some civilians. Assad would have to be braindead stupid to do this, because of the international reactions. I'm just not seeing it. But any of a number of other parties might well see the possibilities.

    So the US is now blowing up Assad's airfields. This should extend the war nicely, making him take a lot longer to knock out the rebels and ISIS. Who gains from this?

    Um...why did the US want to topple Assad?

    - It adds yet another ungovernable country in the region, adding to their collection of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. Maybe the US keeps a trophy wall in the White House?

    - Keeps funding flowing to the military industrial complex.

    - Keeps refugees flowing, especially into Europe.

    - Adds to world chaos.

    None of those really make a lot of sense, but there is some reason that the US is tromping around Syria. Whatever the motivation was for the original actions, it would apply to this situation as well. So...what are the chances that the US organized a bit of nerve gas, and paid some useful idiot to drop it on civilians? Thus justifying the attack on Assad's airfields, thus extending the war?

    Maybe that's tinfoil hat territory, but it's as believable as anything else in this unbelievable mess...

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by Unixnut on Friday April 07 2017, @11:04AM

    by Unixnut (5779) on Friday April 07 2017, @11:04AM (#490157)

    Not to mention, the last time Assad was accused of using chemical weapons, the US threatened to bomb, Russia stepped in, and under international oversight (and confirmation by all parties) the chemical weapon stockpile held by Assad was removed from the country and destroyed.

    Since then Assad has not had any chemical weapons, not (as you pointed out) he would need them, seeing as the war has turned in his favour. So why go through the hassle to acquire chemical weapons (off the black market most likely), pay for them, use them just to kill ~100 people, and incur the wrath of the international community, and give the US another pretext to attack. I mean, it really makes no sense logically.

    So, "False flag" comes to mind. Someone else staged it so they could blame Assad and set a pretext for an attack.